They boycotted goods and services offered by the British and home-made things.
The colonists killed redcoats (Boston Massacre) when the Townshends Act was passed. And Samuel Adams ordered a rebellion of the Tea, so when the British East India Company was overstocked with 17 million pounds of unsold tea. If the company collapsed, the London government would lose much money. Therefore, the London government gave the company a full monopoly of the tea sell in America.
Fearing that it was trick to pay more taxes on tea, the Americans rejected the tea. When the ships arrived in the Boston harbor, the governor of Massachusetts, Thomas Hutchinson, forced the citizens to allow the ships to unload their tea.
On December 16, 1773, a group of colonist disguised as Indians dumped the tea into the sea (Boston Tea Party). Then The Association called for a complete boycott of all British goods.
**Just a slight touch up on your information. During the Boston Massacre no redcoats were killed. The only people killed were five unarmed waterfront workers who were harassing the redcoats.
They boycotted goods and services offered by the British and home-made things.
"No taxation without representation"
"No taxation without representation"
Taxation without representation was a huge complaint by the colonists because they believed it violated their rights as English citizens. They argued that since they had no elected representatives in the British Parliament, they had no say in decisions regarding taxation. This lack of representation was seen as unfair and oppressive, leading to increasing tensions between the colonists and the British government.
no taxation without representationFreedom of the press was the most cherished right for the Colonists in America in the 18th century.No taxation without representaton
The American colonists wanted to have representation in the British parliament so they would have a voice regarding taxation. This was to the British, a privilege they would not support.
"No taxation without representation"
"No taxation without representation"
Because the colonists weren't represented in the British government thus "no taxation with out representation!"
They boycotted goods and services offered by the British and home-made things.
They boycotted goods and services offered by the British and home-made things.
The battlecry was "Taxation without representation". The British government imposed taxes upon the colonists; but the colonists had no say in what was taxed and by how much.
In a nutshell, they were angry because they had no direct representation in the British Government. Taxation without representation!
Taxation without representation was a huge complaint by the colonists because they believed it violated their rights as English citizens. They argued that since they had no elected representatives in the British Parliament, they had no say in decisions regarding taxation. This lack of representation was seen as unfair and oppressive, leading to increasing tensions between the colonists and the British government.
As the British government passed new tax laws, resistance by the colonists grew.
no taxation without representationFreedom of the press was the most cherished right for the Colonists in America in the 18th century.No taxation without representaton
no taxation without representationFreedom of the press was the most cherished right for the Colonists in America in the 18th century.No taxation without representaton
colonists believed that since the government had no representative they had no right to tax them. Their rallying cry was "NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!"