answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

As per the theory of white man's burden, the white man of Europe was civilized, while the natives of Asia, Africa and the Americas were not. So, as colonizers of the Asian and African nations, the burden of civilizing the natives fell on the white man, as per this theory.


To answer the impact on colonized people, there were those among them who adopted Western culture, banishing and denigrating their own. Then, there was another category that tried to fuse what was best in their culture and Western culture, and tried to prove to the whites that there culture was equally great, if not greater (in the Indian context, some examples of such people would include Raja Rammohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda and Mahatma Gandhi). Then, there were others who made exaggerated claims about their culture, and tried to prove that everything good and great emerged in their country only. Then, there was a fourth category of conservatives, who even upheld those practices in their culture that were considered to be social evils and blamed the Westerners for disturbing the established order of things.


Many of the people in the first category emraced Christianity, though there were many other factors responsible for people embracing Christianity outside the Middle East and Europe.

User Avatar

Jaqueline Leuschke

Lvl 10
2y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

The ideas expressed in "The White Man's Burden" promoted the belief that Western powers had a duty to civilize and uplift colonized populations. This led to policies of exploitation, forced assimilation, and cultural erasure, resulting in long-lasting negative impacts on the lives of colonized people such as loss of autonomy, disruption of traditional ways of life, and economic exploitation.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: How did the ideas expressed in the white man's burden affect the lives of colonized people?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What are the main ideas expressed in The White Man's Burden?

to show how white people have problems to, just like colored/different people. -MM


What expressed the brief that colonial policies should consider the intersects of colonized people as well as those of imperialist power?

the Magna Carta


What is the tone of the poor man's burden?

The tone of "The White Man's Burden" is paternalistic and condescending, suggesting that it is the duty of the colonizer to uplift and civilize the colonized populations. It reflects a sense of superiority and entitlement by the colonizers towards the people they seek to dominate.


What was the rhetorical goal of Kipling's the white mans burden?

The rhetorical goal of Kipling's "The White Man's Burden" was to justify Western imperialism by portraying it as a noble mission to civilize and educate non-Western people. It presented the colonizers as saviors burdened with the responsibility of uplifting and guiding the colonized populations.


How did the ideas expressed in the white mans burden affect the lives of colonized people?

As per the theory of white man's burden, the white man of Europe was civilized, while the natives of Asia, Africa and the Americas were not. So, as colonizers of the Asian and African nations, the burden of civilizing the natives fell on the white man, as per this theory.To answer the impact on colonized people, there were those among them who adopted Western culture, banishing and denigrating their own. Then, there was another category that tried to fuse what was best in their culture and Western culture, and tried to prove to the whites that there culture was equally great, if not greater (in the Indian context, some examples of such people would include Raja Rammohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda and Mahatma Gandhi). Then, there were others who made exaggerated claims about their culture, and tried to prove that everything good and great emerged in their country only. Then, there was a fourth category of conservatives, who even upheld those practices in their culture that were considered to be social evils and blamed the Westerners for disturbing the established order of things.Many of the people in the first category emraced Christianity, though there were many other factors responsible for people embracing Christianity outside the Middle East and Europe.


Is there a sense of us and them in the white man burden?

Yes, the concept of the "white man's burden" implies a paternalistic attitude where white people see themselves as superior and responsible for guiding and civilization non-white cultures. This can create a clear division between the white colonizers and the colonized people, reinforcing an "us versus them" mentality.


According to kipling what happens to young white men when their countries take up white mans burden?

Kipling suggests that when young white men take up the "white man's burden," they bear the responsibility of civilizing and ruling over people in colonized countries. This burden may lead to hardship and conflict, as they strive to fulfill their duties as imperial rulers.


What does the word captives mean in Kipling's White Man's Burden?

In Kipling's "White Man's Burden," the term "captives" refers to the indigenous people of the colonized territories who are seen as needing to be civilized and uplifted by Western powers. The poem suggests that it is the duty of the colonizers to educate and civilize these "captives" for their own benefit.


Who coloninized the Karen people?

No one really colonized them, they colonized them self


Read the following excerpt from British poet Rudyard Kipling's The White Man's Burden written in 1899. How does it relate to the European imperialism at th?

European nations often viewed colonized people as inferior to Europeans. :)


How did the idea expressed in the white man's burden affect the lives of colonized people?

As per the theory of white man's burden, the white man of Europe was civilized, while the natives of Asia, Africa and the Americas were not. So, as colonizers of the Asian and African nations, the burden of civilizing the natives fell on the white man, as per this theory.To answer the impact on colonized people, there were those among them who adopted Western culture, banishing and denigrating their own. Then, there was another category that tried to fuse what was best in their culture and Western culture, and tried to prove to the whites that there culture was equally great, if not greater (in the Indian context, some examples of such people would include Raja Rammohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda and Mahatma Gandhi). Then, there were others who made exaggerated claims about their culture, and tried to prove that everything good and great emerged in their country only. Then, there was a fourth category of conservatives, who even upheld those practices in their culture that were considered to be social evils and blamed the Westerners for disturbing the established order of things.Many of the people in the first category emraced Christianity, though there were many other factors responsible for people embracing Christianity outside the Middle East and Europe.


How did the ideas expressed in the white man Burden affect colonized people?

As per the theory of white man's burden, the white man of Europe was civilized, while the natives of Asia, Africa and the Americas were not. So, as colonizers of the Asian and African nations, the burden of civilizing the natives fell on the white man, as per this theory.To answer the impact on colonized people, there were those among them who adopted Western culture, banishing and denigrating their own. Then, there was another category that tried to fuse what was best in their culture and Western culture, and tried to prove to the whites that there culture was equally great, if not greater (in the Indian context, some examples of such people would include Raja Rammohan Roy, Swami Vivekananda and Mahatma Gandhi). Then, there were others who made exaggerated claims about their culture, and tried to prove that everything good and great emerged in their country only. Then, there was a fourth category of conservatives, who even upheld those practices in their culture that were considered to be social evils and blamed the Westerners for disturbing the established order of things.Many of the people in the first category emraced Christianity, though there were many other factors responsible for people embracing Christianity outside the Middle East and Europe.