Civilians in all wars become inter twined with events taking place. Southern civilians during the U.S. Civil War 1861-1865, civilians in occupied France during WWII, and civilians in South Vietnam during the war, all, unfortunately become involved. If the conflict, such as WWI for example, takes places in a more "traditional clear cut setting" such as trenches two miles north of their city, then the intermingling of soldiers and civilians may be less complicated. But if their is NO "clear cut" front lines, then the war (conflict) becomes more complicated when the enemy soldier can and does try to intermingle with the civilians. Instead of a front line soldier we now have a guerrilla or insurgent. He sells you food in the local store by day, and fights against you when he becomes a guerrilla or insurgent by night. During the Vietnam War, the Viet Cong, who were Southern sympathizers, often operated as guerrilla/insurgents. They were largely eliminated during the TET offensive of 1968, because they surfaced into the open, and were clearly identified. From 1968 on, the U.S. and allies were now, predominately, facing the North Vietnamese Army (NVA), a far more deadly foe.
Based upon the information I have read.. there is little difference between Vietnamese and Iraqi civilian behavior during the wars. Some look to the US for help, some appreciate the efforts allied forces have made, and yet others fought or are fighting allied forces/US forces with every man woman or child they can recruit. This particular frame of mind can also be found in many war type scenarios.
life has become a lot more dangerous. there is open religious intimidation. national ifrastructure is totaly unreliable.
America was successful in defeating the Iraqi Regime of Saddam Hussein and establishing a new Iraqi Regime, but lost a lot of credibility internationally since there were no weapons of mass destruction discovered and over 150,000 Iraqi civilians died.
Iraqi
It isn't actually "both sides." There are several countries involved. Everywhere you look, the numbers are different. They are actually very inconsistent. According to the Iraq Body Count Project, between March 2003 and October 2011, there were 150,726 war related deaths. 113,125 of these deaths were civilians.
Based upon the information I have read.. there is little difference between Vietnamese and Iraqi civilian behavior during the wars. Some look to the US for help, some appreciate the efforts allied forces have made, and yet others fought or are fighting allied forces/US forces with every man woman or child they can recruit. This particular frame of mind can also be found in many war type scenarios.
Yes. SouthWEST Asians would be Iraqi's, etc.
The Iraqi Government did NOT send out it's Iraqi Navy Torpedo Boats to attack US Navy warships on the high seas. The North Vietnamese Navy DID attack US Navy warships upon the high seas. No comparison.
US Servicemen were fighting regular (NVA) soldiers and airmen from the North Vietnamese Army, Air Force, and Navy (Tonkin Gulf Incident). US Servicemembers are NOT fighting the Iraqi Air Force, Army, or Navy.
www.iraqibodycount.org, Iraqi civilians and militants are estimated, and US troops are counted
U.S. Military Has Killed Up to 238000 Iraqi Civilians ... and it represents an astonishing 2.5 percent of the country's total population. ...
At least 600,000 people lost their lives (300,000 Iranian soldiers, 150,000 Iraqi soldiers, and 150,000 civilians). The real death toll is probably closer to 2,000,0000 dead (800,000 Iranian soldiers, 350,000 Iraqi soldiers, 200,000 civilians, 200,000 genocide victims, and other miscellaneous deaths).
"Compare", by its definition, is a verb. To compare means to take two or more things and identify their similarities.Although "compare" is not an action you could physically see, it is still a verb since when you take two things and identify their similarities, whether it is in thought, in speaking, or in writing, you are doing something.The following is a sentence that makes use of "compare" as a verb.As part of my research paper on the Iraqi and the Vietnam War, I compared the experiences of soldiers in one war to the experiences of soldiers in the other war.
"Compare", by its definition, is a verb. To compare means to take two or more things and identify their similarities.Although "compare" is not an action you could physically see, it is still a verb since when you take two things and identify their similarities, whether it is in thought, in speaking, or in writing, you are doing something.The following is a sentence that makes use of "compare" as a verb.As part of my research paper on the Iraqi and the Vietnam War, I compared the experiences of soldiers in one war to the experiences of soldiers in the other war.
life has become a lot more dangerous. there is open religious intimidation. national ifrastructure is totaly unreliable.
It was not really a war. It was a genocide. Thousands of Kurds (civilians in most cases) were gassed to death by a merciless Iraqi Regime. There were certainly Kurdish militants who tried to fight back, but they were nowhere near as effective as the Iraqi Army.
America was successful in defeating the Iraqi Regime of Saddam Hussein and establishing a new Iraqi Regime, but lost a lot of credibility internationally since there were no weapons of mass destruction discovered and over 150,000 Iraqi civilians died.