0
If cloning was allowed would a clone of a clone of a clone of a clone have a right to clone itself?
Getreal
One would hope that if cloning were allowed, the clones would be defined as people. If they are people then they should have the same rights as people who are not cloned. If people who are not cloned have the right to clone themselves then those who are should have it as well.
The word "right" can have a legal and an ethical aspect. The question might be talking about whether the practice is legal or whether it is moral.
The Legal Profession treats that sort of question as money in the Bank and will vigorously defend you right to your opinion. The Religious Ethics community will likely oppose any such question until they have debated the question for several years.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the controversy of cloning humans?
The controversy surrounding human cloning is an ethical issue. People wonder if humans have the right to create other humans and if humans do have that right, do they also have the right to take life away? The controversy is over life and death and who has the power to control them.
The process of using plasmids gene cloning?
That's right! :P
Is it right to clone someone and then take an organ when needed and kill the clone after?
Only you can answer your question. The answer is going to be different for everyone, and your opinion will be based on your own personal beliefs.
What is therapeutic cloning?
It uses the same procedure as adult DNA cloning to start with. The created embryo will be allowed to grow for around 2 weeks. Its stem cells would be taken and encouraged to grow into a human organ.
Would human clones have identical fingerprints?
nope, if what i understand is right, then no they don't.
What Is Wrong With Cloning?
Definitely. It's not even right to clone any humans.
What is the controversy of cloning humans?
The controversy surrounding human cloning is an ethical issue. People wonder if humans have the right to create other humans and if humans do have that right, do they also have the right to take life away? The controversy is over life and death and who has the power to control them.
Would cloning women eliminate man?
NOOOOOOOOO!!! THis is same either way around. This is because cloning, not to mention the fact that we clone hundreds of times wrong before we clone right, but cloning gives the exact same genes to the receiver. This will decrease genetic diversity, and all of humans would be destroyed because we would get dumber after every clone, and a disease would kill much more because we didn't have enough genetic diversity
How can the cloning tool in Photoshop CS5 be fixed when it keeps stamping black instead of the selected area?
Try to reset tool, choose Clone Stamp tool and below File menu you will see clone stamp icon, right click on it and choose Reset Tool.
Is cloning morally right why?
This is an ethical question and is based on personal opinions.There are many types of cloning and two of them are reproductive and therapeutic. Usually when people think that cloning is ethically right, they are mostly focusing on therapeutic cloning which is only creating a whole new single body part from a single cell. People who generally think that cloning is wrong are focusing more on the reproductive cloning which creates an entirely new organism.Both sides have their pros and cons. For example, therapeutic can create new body parts for a sick person and save their lives, using the same person's cells. But reproductive cloning may cause many problems such as people have too similar DNA and letting new diseases arise.My personal opinion is that cloning should be allowed for therapeutic reasons only but should be controlled so the research does not get out of control. If people were able to learn how to clone someone or something, this could cause multiple issues for humans and other species.
In Pokemon pearl I have tried the clone cheat for the master ball but it doesn't work. What is the real cheat?
i did not know there was that cheat but right now im frustrated over the Pokemon Pokemon cloning cheat. it work for me!
Does cloning conflict with religion?
No, not really. In a way it does, but, technically, no. You're not "creating" life when you clone somebody. Merely "copying" it. But it's playing God. It's on dangerous ground. Right on the brink of angering God.
How can you get a bad clone in Pokemon Crystal?
do the cloning process but turn the game off before any part of the SAVING... DONT TURN OFF THE POWER! appears. there is no exact way of getting a bad clone but this raises your chances of getting one.
Is cloning good or bad?
Cloning is good, because a person with organ disease may not find the perfect organ donor match but if you clone them use the clones organs.ducklover132's answer:Why is cloning good?Debate Profession: Sam and KassidyReason 1: They allow us to clone body parts for those who need it. They allow them to let those people who are supposed to die, live. For instance, let's say all of the sudden Korbyn's heart fails. And all the doctors and nurses search and search for the right kind of heart, but they can't find the right type. And they say the only way that Korbyn can live is to clone her. If Korbyn says no, she dies. If she says yes, she lives. Cloning saves lives.Reason 2: One of the benefits of cloning isreproducing animals. For instance, what about the tiger and giant panda? They're endangered. What if comes to when only one tiger and giant panda are left on Earth, and the only way to keep them alive is to clone them. So you decide to save the panda and kill the tiger. You might wonder why it would matter, but animals have feelings too. We don't want to die, but neither does the animals. Another reason for reproducing animals is for food. You could clone pigs, cows, and chickens, and end up with more bacon, sausage, hamburgers, and barbeque chicken.Cloning is bad:)
Why can't we clone organs to be used for transplants?
Because, we can't clone anything at all right now.
Is test tube cloning right or wrong?
In many respects it is morally neutral. From one point of view, it is simply the creation of another life or the imitation of, something that happens on a regular basis naturally. In fact, the act of procreation itself is morally neutral. Imitation of a natural phenomena is hardly unethical either, else many buildings (dams) and technologies (web [internet]) would be morally wrong. Many religions find the concept abhorrent due to the idea that cloning is encroaching upon the territory of their deity. Cloning itself is a tool, a process and as such has no moral leaning. It can be 'right' or 'wrong'.
Do Christians believe in animal cloning?
Yes, Christians believe in animal cloning there is plenty of evidence to suggest animal cloning happens. The real question is - is animal cloning morally right? However the Bible does not say if animal cloning is right or wrong and probably most Christians have no opinion about animal cloning. Jesus said "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" not go and be involved in animal rights or politics.
