Yes. Not all cultures are tolerant or each other as equals, so using tolerance as a rationale for allowing all cultures to mutually exist as equals does not work if one of the cultures involved does not see the others as equals.
Most sociologists agree that it is important to practice cultural relativism because it leads to tolerance. Cultural relativism is a term used that believes that all value systems are correct.
Cultural relativism, as described by philosopher James Rachels, allows for tolerance of different cultural practices and beliefs. It acknowledges that each culture has its own customs and norms that may be valid within that cultural context. This approach promotes understanding and acceptance of cultural diversity.
The ideology of cultural relativism was started by Franz Boas. Cultural relativism decrees that an individual should be judged based on their culture.
Cultural relativism becomes vulgar when it is used to justify harmful practices or oppress certain groups, ignoring basic human rights. Anthropologists avoid this by maintaining a critical stance towards cultural practices, taking into account broader social contexts and power dynamics. They seek to understand the complexities of different cultural beliefs and practices without condoning unethical behaviors.
"The major flaw in cultural relativism is that the concept of relativism is wrong. We are now witnessing "cultural relativism" throughout the world with particular emphasis on terrorism: their cultural relativism is the world's capitulation or death with no other choices. " Above a typical Enlightened Absolutist opininion (no offense). Using the word 'wrong' in absolute way. And pointing at unfavourable views as 'terrorism'. An enlightening example of what is not cultural relativism
Marketing relativism is a subtle and unintended result of cultural conditioning.
Cultural Relativism
learning languages
According to cultural relativism, the morally right action is determined by the norms and values of a particular culture or society. It suggests that there is no universal standard of morality, and what is considered right or wrong can vary between different cultures.
A cultural relativist does not believe in an absolute morality--what is moral changes according to the cultural context and situation.
The justification of it would be.
Individual ethical relativism is the belief that each person sets their own moral standards based on their own personal beliefs, experiences, and circumstances. This means that what is considered right or wrong can vary from person to person, depending on their individual perspective.