Mali's rise to power began under the ruler of Sundiata. Who gathered an army to win back his home empire and then later took on the role of Mansa which mean s ruler. He also played a huge role in society and bringng cotton to the people.
An absolute ruler in the empire under the republic form of government was a dictator. Under the principate the "emperor"was the absolute ruler at all times.
Land with different territories and people under a single rule is a monarchy. In a monarchy there is a king or queen in power. There might or might not be many territories.
It was difficult to unite the Fertile Crescent under one ruler cauae or effect ?
Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.Actually nothing. Rome was already an empire under the republic. When the republic fell it was replaced by the principate, not the empire as is mistakenly assumed. The change from the republic to the principate was marked by the rise to power of Octavian/Augustus. He won the right to be sole ruler after the battle of Actium.
Empire
empire
Persian Empire
The Mali Empire.
Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).Cleopatra did not kill her brother to have the throne; she already had the throne, but she had to share it with him as co-rulers. By killing him, she in effect had sole power because she named her baby son, Caesarion, as her co-ruler. (under Egyptian law a queen had to have a male co-ruler).
During the republic, someone who was given complete power was called a dictator, such as Sula or Caesar. Under the principate the emperor or the "Caesar" had complete power.
An absolute ruler in the empire under the republic form of government was a dictator. Under the principate the "emperor"was the absolute ruler at all times.
You could say loosely that Augustus succeeded Julius Caesar. Caesar had been dictator at the time of his death, under the republican form of government. This meant that he had supreme power under the republic. When Augustus gained supreme power he did away with the republic and began the principate. So in one way your could say that he actually succeeded no one, and in another way you could say that he succeeded Caesar as sole ruler.
Land with different territories and people under a single rule is a monarchy. In a monarchy there is a king or queen in power. There might or might not be many territories.
Northwestern corner
Osiris was the ruler of the underworld in ancient Egypt.
The ruler of where? Never mind. I see the question is under the category of English history.
Inca ruler in about 1438