The Missouri Compromise was a winner for no one, It was a compromise that only delayed the inevitable clash between the agrarian South and the industrial North on that issue. The US Civil War was temporarily postponed but was inevitable in any case. The issue had been present since Independence and the Founding Fathers had not been able to resolve it. Perhaps they felt that time and modern economics alone would end the practice of slavery. They failed to recognize that it was not simply a matter of States Rights. It was a fundamental flaw in society that could only be resolved by freedom, equality and justice for all.
1850
I think the compromise of 1850 was a good solution because slavery is just wrong.
Senator Henry Clay drafted the compromise of 1850, the compromise consisted of a series of laws (5 bills ) which attempted to resolve territorial and slavery issues
it stop slavery in most of the states
Texas - where slavery had been illegal for some time, when it was a Mexican province.
There is not a Compromise of 1950 but there is a Compromise of 1850. The Compromise of 1850 consists of five laws passed in September of 1850 that dealt with the issue of slavery.
The Missouri Compromise postponed the issue of slavery.
It abolished slavery in Texas.
compromise of 1850
1850
yes or no
The compromise of 1850, territories were opened to slavery. Utah and new Mexico
I think the compromise of 1850 was a good solution because slavery is just wrong.
the abolition of slavery in the District of Columbia
pro-savery
The Compromise of 1850 abolished slavery in the state of Washington DC. It also allowed California to become part of the union as a slave free state.
The Compromise of 1850 offered the Fugitive slave act to supporters of slavery. This meant that if a slave ran away he could be caught by his owner.