basically the same as fission bombs but as the yield of fusion bombs are typically much higher the effects are typically much higher.
Note: it is possible to build clean low yield fusion bombs with far less fallout than similar yield fission bombs, but the prompt radiation effects are worse.
Atomic bombs, not hydrogen..The U.S. in August 1945.
No.
They never used hydrogen bombs in Japan. They used nuclear bombs which produces gamma rays not the lethal doses of x-rays produced by the hydrogen bomb.
No. Atomic bombs were used during WW2 in Japan, but they were "fission" weapons, which derived their destructive power from splitting apart the nucleus of an atom. Hydrogen bombs derive their destructive power from "fusion" reactions, or the merging of two Hydrogen atoms. This is the same chemical reaction that powers the sun. Hydrogen bombs were tested for the first time on November 1, 1952.
Nuclear bombs is all types of bombs that use nuclear energy. It is not a type of bomb,just a category of bombs. hydrogen bomb is the strongest bomb ever, and its blast yield can go up to 100megatons of TNT.
Hydrogen bombs are legal
Yes, America does possess hydrogen bombs
"Millions of hydrogen bombs"
Atomic bombs, not hydrogen..The U.S. in August 1945.
Of course, hydrogen bombs are real from more than 60 years.
The same nuclear radiation is released by both fission (atomic) and fusion (hydrogen) bombs. Hydrogen bombs are larger, and produce more.
No.
There were no hydrogen bombs (fusion bombs) detonated during WWII.
They never used hydrogen bombs in Japan. They used nuclear bombs which produces gamma rays not the lethal doses of x-rays produced by the hydrogen bomb.
Hydrogen bombs have never been used in war. They have only been exploded in test shots.
Of course not, it was just for fun (by the way the bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki were uranium bombs and not hydrogen)
A hydrogen bomb.