0
What called for the legalization of slavery in territories south of 36 30.?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
In the period between 1820 and 1860 southerners wanted slavery extended to the western territories so that the south could?
maintain political power by ensuring that new states admitted to the Union would allow slavery, preserve the economic benefits of slavery for the southern plantation system, and protect the social hierarchy that relied on slavery for labor. This desire to expand slavery into western territories ultimately fueled tensions between the North and South, leading to the American Civil War.
What did the south think about the dred Scott decision?
The South supported the Dred Scott decision, as it reinforced the rights of slave owners to take their slaves into territories where slavery was prohibited. They viewed it as a victory for protecting their property rights and upholding the institution of slavery.
How did the settling of new territories escalate conflict over slavery?
The settlement of new territories in the United States heightened conflict over slavery because it raised questions about whether these territories would allow slavery or be free. This tension intensified as each side sought to exert influence over the new territories to ensure its position on slavery was upheld. Ultimately, these disputes led to the Civil War, as the North and South could not reconcile their differing views on slavery in the expanding nation.
Which territories was slavery permitted?
Territories of which country? There are over 215 countries on the planet, each with their own territories.Re-ask the question with the missing information.
Which did the Wilmer proviso provide for?
The Wilmot Proviso aimed to ban slavery in territories acquired after the Mexican-American War, specifically in the lands taken from Mexico. It was a controversial proposal that heightened tensions between the North and South over the issue of slavery expansion.
Why was there so much North vs South tension over territorial expansion?
There was this tension, because the territories claimed by the South became slave territories and the territories claimed by the North became free territories. The North wanted no slavery and the South wanted slaves. So, the North and south raced to get as much land as possible to cause the other direction ( N. or S. ) to submit into slavery or no slavery
Why was the issue of slavery in territories so important to the north and south?
that crazy boiii
Who was South carliona Senator that argued about slavery being allowed in the territories?
John C. Calhoun
Who was the senator would proposed a plan to protect slavery in territories in the south?
John C. Calhoun.
Why did the south want to expand slavery to the north?
The south was based off of farming. They had a small scale of land and a low population. They wanted to reach new territories to help promote slavery and farming.
Should slavery be allowed to expand into the territories if the people of those territories want it?
Consider this: Exactly which "people of those territories" wanted expansion of slavery. Definitely not any of the black people. Actually, nearly all the lobbying for slavery came from people living in the South who were anxious to gain more power in the House and Senate for their cause.
What about slavery below south of the line in Missouri compromise?
South ofthat line, slavery was allowed. But it only applied to the territories acquired from France in the Louisiana Purchase of 1803. When the USA acquired vast new lands from Mexico in 1847, a new compromise had to be worked out, in view of the Wilmot Proviso, which declared that no slavery should be allowed in any of these new territories.
Why did the South perceive the Wilmot Proviso as such a threat?
Because the Wilmot Proviso sought to halt the extension of slavery in the western territories
In the period between 1820 and 1860 southerners wanted slavery extended to the western territories so that the south could?
maintain political power by ensuring that new states admitted to the Union would allow slavery, preserve the economic benefits of slavery for the southern plantation system, and protect the social hierarchy that relied on slavery for labor. This desire to expand slavery into western territories ultimately fueled tensions between the North and South, leading to the American Civil War.
What was the Southern response to the ideas of banning slavery in the US territories?
Southern plantation holders were appalled at the idea that that slavery would be banned in the US territories. They realized that as the territories became States and continued their anti slavery positions, the South would became an even smaller group of slave holding States. In turn, this could lead to the abolition of slavery nationwide. They were correct in this assumption. Most Americans were against slavery. In the days of antebellum, their Congressional response was the passing of the Missouri Compromises.
What caused the issue that the north and south fought over in the government when they avoided the slavery issue by the compromises?
The issue that the North and South fought over was called the Wilmot Proviso. It was basically a law of slavery: the North and South were fighting over slavery. The North were anti-slavery and the South were pro-slavery
What territories Did Missouri compromise allow slavery in?
The Missouri Compromise addressed slavery in the Arkansas and unorganized territory of the Great Plains. Slavery was prohibited in all of these areas, except within the boundaries of Missouri.
