Generally speaking, slaves in the US prior to and during the US Civil War, lived in housing that they spent their non-working hours. This was the situation in US slave owning states and also in the parts of the Western Hemisphere that were slave owning areas or nations. Brazil for example had housing for slaves until Brazil abolished slavery very late in the 19th Century.
It refers to the housing or cabins where slaves lived.
Missouri itself - after which only states South of Missouri's Southern border could be slave-states. Or it is just possible that you may mean Utah, one of the terms of the 1850 Compromise.
The second excerpt of what? I assume you mean in his inauguration, when he promised that he wouldn't interfere with slavery in the states in which it already existed, and the he wouldn't maintain the Union by initiating force.
Do you mean the five slave-states that stayed in the Union? There were origially four - Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland and Delaware. A fifth was the newly-created state of West Virginia, which broke away from the Confederate state of Virginia in 1863.
Any shape resembling the curved shape of the moon in its first or last quarters
the new world is the world that Columbus discovered for the Europeans. If it was not for the new world the slave trade could have easily died out.
No. The Dred Scott decision basically said all the states of the USA were slave states and a slave in a "free" state was still a slave. The Dred Scott decision helped to lead to the Civil War.
If you mean the American Civil War of 1861, I believe it could have been averted if California had been two states - Northern California (free soil) and Southern California (slave). If those two states had been admitted to the Union along the lines of the Missouri Compromise, then that successful Compromise could have lasted until slavery died out, as it soon would have done, as more countries refused to trade with a slave-owning nation.
If you mean in the past, it would be whether or not the owning of states was a good or bad thing. South wanted slaves, North did not. The Civil War was a result of this disagreement.
It allowed the slave states to count most of it's slaves in order to have more representation by population. The non-slave states discouraged slavery and put in the 3/5ths clause because of it. It was not meant to mean a slave was only 3/5ths of a man as some would have you believe.
It means the act that the Confederate slave states did when they left the Union. They Seceded.
What kind of "quarters" -or do you mean QUARTS.
That would mean slaves in the Border states - slave-states that had voted against joining the Confederacy. Those people would have to remain slaves until the war was won, as Lincoln did not want to upset powerful slave-owners in these crucially important states.
Yes. If you mean 'the rent for last month', certainly. If you mean the 'last month rent deposit', probably, if the rental agreement states that the deposit was to have been funded.
Place of residence.
Well, if you mean what picture is inscribed on a quarter, then I will tell you. There used to be an eagle, but now the 50 US states have quarters with their state logo thing on it.
If you mean 3 dollars, there would be 12 quarters.
Unless in mint or proof sets, only face value. They are all incredibly common and unless in a set they are only worth 25 cents. Each state quarter is worth face value, 25 cents each. There is no difference in value between these and regular quarters. If you mean an entire set of state quarters, there are 50 states, so fifty states times 25 cents each mean that an entire 50-quarter set is worth $12.50.