answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

someone died

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What fact led up to the case being appealed to the Supreme Court in Mapp vs Ohio?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What was Dollree Mapp charged with in the Supreme Court case Mapp Ohio?

having obscene books


When did the Supreme Court hear and decide the Mapp vs Ohio case?

nice


The Supreme Court case of Mapp v Ohio established the?

exclusionary rule


Famous supreme court case dealing with probable cause?

Mapp vs. Ohio


What was dollree mapp charged with in the supreme court case mappv?

having obscene books


What type of case was Mapp v Ohio?

Land mark criminal procedure case involving appeals to the Supreme court


What rationale has the US Supreme Court adopted for excluding illegally obtained evidence from criminal trials?

Mapp v. Ohio


What were the results of Mapp v Ohio?

The primary result of Mapp v. Ohio, (1961) was that the US Supreme Court incorporated the Fourth Amendment to the States and applied the Exclusionary Rule originally established in Weeks v. US, (1914). The Exclusionary Rule prohibits the prosecution from using evidence obtained illegally (in this case, as the result of wrongful search and seizure) to convict the defendant.More InformationDollree Mapp won her US Supreme Court case, Mapp v. Ohio,(1961), by a vote of 6-3, and her conviction for possession of pornography was vacated, ending the seven-year prison sentence Ohio imposed in 1958.Although Mapp's attorney argued originally argued the Ohio law under which Mapp was convicted was unconstitutional because it was overbroad and infringed on her First Amendment rights, the Supreme Court ultimately decided the case on the basis of a Fourth Amendment search and seizure violation, incorporating that Amendment to the states and extending the federal "exclusionary rule" to prohibit illegally obtained evidence from being used against the defendant in court.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)


Who were the lawyers who argued Mapp v. Ohio before the US Supreme Court?

Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)Petitioner: MappAttorney: A. L. KearnsAmici: Bernard Berkman (ACLU, argued for reversal of Ohio Supreme Court decision)Respondent: State of OhioAttorney: Gertrude Bauer MahonFor more information, see Related Questions, below.


What are the related cases with Mapp v Ohio?

There are no other 'related' cases. The US Supreme Court only takes one representative case for review when considering the constitutionality of a law. If, indeed, there even were other cases, ONLY the Mapp v. Ohio case was chosen.


What happened to Ms. Mapp in her US Supreme Court case Mapp v Ohio?

Dollree Mapp won her US Supreme Court case by a vote of 6-3, and her conviction for possession of pornography was vacated, ending the seven-year prison sentence Ohio imposed in 1958.Although Mapp's attorney argued originally argued the Ohio law under which Mapp was convicted was unconstitutional because it was overbroad and infringed on her First Amendment rights, the Supreme Court ultimately decided the case on the basis of a Fourth Amendment search and seizure violation, incorporating that Amendment to the states and extending the federal "exclusionary rule" to prohibit illegally obtained evidence from being used against the defendant in court.Mapp faded into obscurity and moved to Queens, NY, where she purchased a furniture store. In 1970, police allegedly discovered approximately 50,000 heroine packets in an apartment she owned and shared with a boyfriend. The two were arrested, and Mapp was convicted (legally, this time) and sentenced to 20 years to life in a New York state prison. The Governor of New York commuted Mapp's sentence in 1980.Case Citation:Mapp v. Ohio, 367 US 643 (1961)For more information, see Related Questions, below.


Which Supreme Court case established that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment may not be used in state law criminal prosecutions in state courts?

Mapp v. Ohio