The Altaic language family is a proposed but controversial group of languages that includes Turkish, Mongolian, and various other languages spoken in Central Asia and parts of East Asia. However, the classification of Altaic languages as a distinct family is not universally accepted among linguists.
No, Korean is not an Indo-European language. It belongs to the Koreanic language family, which is a language isolate with no known genealogical relationship to any other language family.
Finnish is neither a Germanic nor a Slavic language. It is a Finno-Ugric language, belonging to the Uralic language family, which includes Estonian and Hungarian.
the tibetan language is most closely related to burmese.the tibetan script/alphabet is indic in origin.the tibetan language and Chinese languages are very different in grammar.tibetan sentence order being Subject-Object-Verb and Chinese being Subject-Verb-Object.although tibetan and Chinese do share a handful of words in common,just like how Chinese and Korean share some words in common,tibetan should not be classified with Chinese.Korean is also not classified in the Chinese language family.Korean is a language isolate,meaning it does not belong to a language family although some scientists suggest an altaic origin.Korean and other altaic languages have the same sentence order as tibetan i.e SOV.these altaic speaking peoples are mostly nomadic like the tibetans and mongols. currently tibetan is classified in the "sino-tibetan" language family even though the tibetan and Chinese language have nothing in common besides a few words.the CCP uses this classification to justify its occupation on Tibet.
There are around 7 major language families in the world, including Indo-European, Sino-Tibetan, Afro-Asiatic, Niger-Congo, Austronesian, Dravidian, and Altaic. Each of these language families contains numerous languages that share a common ancestor.
The Turks and Mongols were significant nomadic peoples who spoke languages derived from a single parent tongue. The Turkic languages and Mongolic languages, respectively, have common origins and are branches of the larger Altaic language family.
That is controversial, but there is. Altaic is a proposed language family that includes the Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, and Japonic language families and the Korean language. The group is named after the Altai Mountains, a mountain range in Central Asia.
Very probably but not absolutely sure, after the opinion of some specialists.
No, Korean is not an Indo-European language. It belongs to the Koreanic language family, which is a language isolate with no known genealogical relationship to any other language family.
Language families are groups of related languages that descend from a common ancestor language. Examples include the Indo-European, Afro-Asiatic, and Turko-Altaic language families.
The Semitic language family tree is the most important, followed by the Indo-European and Altaic trees.
No. Turkish is an Altaic Language. Kurdish is an Indo-European Language. Kurdish is much closer to Farsi (the language of Iran) than Arabic or Turkish.
The language group "Altaic" refers to spoken languages from Eastern Europe through Asia Minor.
Finnish is neither a Germanic nor a Slavic language. It is a Finno-Ugric language, belonging to the Uralic language family, which includes Estonian and Hungarian.
Altaic is a proposed linguistic classification that includes, in its Macro-Altaic form, the Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic languages, and at times Koreanic and Japonic, the former more often than the latter. In this linguistic sense, Koreans are "Altaic speakers" if you accept the linguistic classification as being true. However, since Altaic is not an ethnic classification, it is not meaningful to ask about whether there are still "Altaic people" in Korea. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altaic_languages for more details about the usage of "Altaic" in the academic sense.
Korean and Chinese are not linguistically related. Korean belongs to the Koreanic language family, while Chinese is a part of the Sino-Tibetan language family. However, due to historical and cultural interactions, there have been influences from Chinese on the Korean language, particularly in terms of vocabulary and writing systems.
No. Turkish has numerous loanwords from Arabic, but does not use Arabic grammar, Arabic base-words, Arabic letters (such as gutturals or emphatics), and retains many unique, Altaic properties such as agglutination.
the tibetan language is most closely related to burmese.the tibetan script/alphabet is indic in origin.the tibetan language and Chinese languages are very different in grammar.tibetan sentence order being Subject-Object-Verb and Chinese being Subject-Verb-Object.although tibetan and Chinese do share a handful of words in common,just like how Chinese and Korean share some words in common,tibetan should not be classified with Chinese.Korean is also not classified in the Chinese language family.Korean is a language isolate,meaning it does not belong to a language family although some scientists suggest an altaic origin.Korean and other altaic languages have the same sentence order as tibetan i.e SOV.these altaic speaking peoples are mostly nomadic like the tibetans and mongols. currently tibetan is classified in the "sino-tibetan" language family even though the tibetan and Chinese language have nothing in common besides a few words.the CCP uses this classification to justify its occupation on Tibet.