Want this question answered?
There are very few advantages for states or countries that use rational-legal authority, as most of them stem from feudal areas and haven't been used since the middle of the 20th Century.
No, medical records are not a source of law. They may be used as evidence in legal proceedings, but they do not have the authority to establish or interpret laws. Legal sources include statutes, regulations, case law, and legal precedent.
While it is preferable to cite binding authority, legal encyclopedias and other secondary sources are often used to supplement binding authority, to explain complex concepts, or to make arguments where there is no binding authority.
Laws are rules or actions prescribed by an authority that have binding legal force. They are created to regulate behavior and maintain order within a society, and violations of laws can result in legal consequences, such as fines or imprisonment.
The principal has the authority to enforce school rules and make decisions regarding student discipline.
Legal rational authority is power based according a set of rules. It is also called legal authority. Examples includes presidential powers.
Legal rational authority is power based according a set of rules. It is also called legal authority. Examples includes presidential powers.
Legal rational authority is power based according a set of rules. It is also called legal authority. Examples includes presidential powers.
1. Traditional 2.Rational-Legal 3.Charasmatic Authority
Rational-legal authority
traditional authority is like kingdoms or dictatorships.. whereas legal authority is found in democratic countries such as the US
Max Weber proposed a three-part typology for authority, traditional, rational-legal and charismatic. Traditional authority leads to feudalism. Rational-legal authority leads to bureaucracy. Charismatic authority leads to a personal structure between a leader and his followers.
custom and accepted practice
There are very few advantages for states or countries that use rational-legal authority, as most of them stem from feudal areas and haven't been used since the middle of the 20th Century.
Rational-legal authority is based on written rules and is considered legitimate because it is deemed fair and agreed upon by the people. This type of authority operates within a framework of established laws and regulations that are adhered to by both the government and the governed.
Christian sources of authority are primarily the Bible. Some Christian churches have leaders who receive revelations from God giving them authority like the Catholic Pope or the Mormon Prophet.
Your question has many possible answers but I will try to answer the one I believe you are after. What is 'Oprah Winfrey' leadership, as in if you used it in a sentence. Gordon Brown doesn't have 'Oprah Winfrey' leadership. What it comes down to is Authority and how you gain it. Oprah Winfrey's opinion is respected because people believe she is speaking with authority. That is from or of a position of authority where a person knows what they are talking about. Max Weber theorised that there was three types of Authority, Tradition - For example a king inherits authority because his family have ruled for decades, Rational - Someone elected has rational or legal authority because people chose to vote for them, Charisma - This is the ability to charm or beguile people with your personality a great example of this would be John F. Kennedy or Barack Obama. Charisma or the ability to be Charasmatic is the method Oprah Winfrey uses to gain Authority and with Authority she exercises leadership and subsequently power.