answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Without clarifying the context, such as what these plans apply to, this question is unanswerable.

If you are referring to the plans for the US Constitution, then the smaller states preferred that all states have an equal vote in the Congressional Houses.

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

They would prefer one state one vote cause they know they well be listen more than the little states.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What plan would states with large populations prefer?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

Who would have been happier with their representation in the senate small states or large states and why?

The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant.The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with larger populations are better represented in the House, where the number of representatives is apportioned by population, than in the Senate where each state is represented equally by two Senators.


How was the electoral college founded?

The electoral college in the US is a compromise reached by the founding fathers. States with smaller populations wanted each state to just have one vote, while states with large populations wanted to have every persons vote. This was not seen as fair by the smaller state because the large states could choose the president every time. So they compromised, each state would have a set number of votes based on the size of that states population.


The great compromise proposed that in the house of representatives?

the states would be represented according to the size of their populations


Which house of congress would have been favored more by large states?

Well, if by large you mean in population, then they would favor the House of Representatives, where the members are determined by population size.


How did the delegates disagree about representation in Congress How was it resolved?

because the number of representatives that a state would have both houses of congress would be based on that state's population. states with more people would have more votes in congress. this plan would have more favor the large States,

Related questions

Where would you find large populations today?

Urbanization


Who would have been happier with their representation in the senate small states or large states and why?

The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant.The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with larger populations are better represented in the House, where the number of representatives is apportioned by population, than in the Senate where each state is represented equally by two Senators.


Who would have been happier with their representation in the house small states or large states and why?

Unlike the Senate where every state receives two representatives, House representation is based on state population. So, more populated states would receive more representatives than less populated states.


Why did differences between states cause problems of repesentation in the new government?

The small states would never agree to a purely representational form of government. They foresaw the annexation of small, ineffective states as the populations of the large states continued to grow and their influence waned.


Some people prefer to work for a large company othere prefer to work for a small company which would you prefer?

I prefer to work in big companies


How was the electoral college founded?

The electoral college in the US is a compromise reached by the founding fathers. States with smaller populations wanted each state to just have one vote, while states with large populations wanted to have every persons vote. This was not seen as fair by the smaller state because the large states could choose the president every time. So they compromised, each state would have a set number of votes based on the size of that states population.


Who would have been happier with their representations in the house small or large states?

In the House of Representatives, the number of delegates a state has is based on its population. The states with larger populations would, therefore, have greater representation and could be said to be happier with the system than states with smaller populations.


What did states with large populationfavorthe Virginia plan?

The Virginia Plan, in having a unicameral legislature whose delegates are assigned by population (much like having just the House of Representatives), favored large states, because their large populations would give them power.


What country is associated with Patrick's day?

Most people would say Ireland, but this holiday has also become popular in a number of countries where there are large Irish populations, including the United States.


What was the fear of other states in the constitution?

During the framing of the U.S. Constitution, states with smaller populations feared that states with larger populations would have more representation in Congress, and thus more power. The constitution was ratified on June 21, 1788.


Why did the smaller state oppose the Virginia Plan?

The smaller states opposed the Virginia Plan due to issues Federalism and representation. Many of them were anti-Federalist, and they worried that states with larger populations would hold all the power.


Who was happier with their representation in the senate small states or large states?

The physical size of states, small or large, was irrelevant. The size of their populations, however, determined their representation in the lower house of Congress. So states with smaller populations are better represented in the Senate, where each state is represented equally by two Senators.