The Virgina Plan was more "approved" than the New Jersey Plan.
The Virginia Plan served largely as the foundation of the U.S. Constitution. However, the concerns of detailed in the New Jersey plan were addressed and incorporated via the Great Compromise. In this compromise, the issue of proportional representation was resolved in the creation of a proportionally represented House of Representatives (proportional to number of people in each state) and an equally represented Senate (each state was granted the same number of representatives, regardless of the number of people living in the state).
The 3/5 compromise was another key part of the Great Compromise. In this compromise, it was agreed that each person working as a slave would count as 3/5 of a person, adding to the representational power of states who had enslaved many people.
Virginia Plan supports the population more while the New Jersey Plan supports the smaller states more so that they will have the equality that they need for the votes and may not be outrunned by the larger states then I THINK: they were both seeking a national government. But the Virginia Plan wanted a stronger one, whereas the New Jersey Plan wanted a weaker one
The Virginia Plan wanted to give states congressional votes based on population (more people = more votes), but this would mean smaller states would have less power and influence in government. The New Jersey Plan was made by the small states to counter it, proposing that each state get an equal amount of votes to be fair. However, the large states contended that they couldn't possibly represent the varied opinions of a huge population in the votes of just a couple representatives. The debate was settled in the Connecticut Compromise. The US would have a bicameral legislative (2 houses): One with the number of votes determined by population (The House of Representatives), and one where each state got just 2 votes (The Senate). Both houses must come to an agreement before a law is passed and each have checks and balances on each other.
The highest body which approves the Five-Year Plan in India is National Development Council
That was Winfield Scott, the General-in-Chief who was still in the chair in 1861, although far too old for the job. His long-term plan for the war was ridiculed as 'Scott's Anaconda' (slow strangulation) at a time when almost everyone else thought it would be a short and fairly bloodless war. Time would prove him right, and the Union did eventually put this sort of plan into effect.
no Neil Armstrong did not say that
the sdr plane was the smaller size in worl
james madison for the virginia plan and william patterson for the new jersey plan
Virginia plan
no, new jersey wanted all states to have the same power
The New Jersey Plan
Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan
The new Jersey plan and the Virginia plan
The New Jersey plan (APEX)
Virginia Plan supports the population more while the New Jersey Plan supports the smaller states more so that they will have the equality that they need for the votes and may not be outrunned by the larger states then I THINK: they were both seeking a national government. But the Virginia Plan wanted a stronger one, whereas the New Jersey Plan wanted a weaker one
Virginia plan
Jersey plan
The New Jersey Plan because they got more rights than the Virginia Plan.