Yes.
Well, if you mean more defined booty-squats for sure.
corn bread girll (:Eating more fat. If you mean more MUSCULAR, than doing squats and lunges.
Squats are as much of a hamstring and quad excersize as the would be for the butt. try lunges instead of squats. you may find they work your desired area more effectively.
corn bread girll (:Eating more fat. If you mean more MUSCULAR, than doing squats and lunges.
I always heard you where kinda born with one.
You are going to come.
No. If you mean is the series going to be revived, then no.
Leg presses will accomplish this - but don't overdo. Increase weights very gradually. Advice from a trainer is ideal. For the aerobic component, jogging - or, better yet, rollerblading - is very helpful.
It's when you squat like both legs at the same time
I have been training heavily for a while, and would think logically that doing sqauts, wide squats and lunges for 15 mins would burn around 100 calories. I am able to do about 45 squats per minute, so that would mean you would have to do around 700 squats in order to burn 100 calories. Hope this helps.
On a topographic map when the contour numbers get bigger that means your going up in elevation. The closer the contour lines are together, the steeper the slope is.
it means that it is going to happen, no matter what!