There were no Greek emperors as there was no Greek empire. The Greek world comprised a myriad of independent city-states.
Some of these city-states from time to time formed defensive leagues, such as the anti-Persian league led by the city-state of Athens, but these had no king or emperor or even centrallised form of government, and so were not empires. Many were subsequently absorbed by the Roman Empire in the west and in the east by Macedonian kingdoms, the latter being in turn taken into the expanding Roman Empire.
There was a Macedonian Empire ruled by Alexander the great, but the Greeks did not consider Macedonians Greek. There were then Macedonian Kingdoms we now call Hellenistic Kingdoms ruled by Alexander's successors, but they did not call themselves Emperors, and the kings and heirarchy kept themselves quite separate as Macedonians and above their Greek and barbarian subjects. These were the Seleucid kings of Syria, Ptolemaic kings of Egypt and the varied kings of Macedonia and Asia Minor. These kingdoms were absorbed into the Roman Empire.
There were then Emperors of the Eastern Roman Empire who, although Greek, called themselves Roman, and when the Western Roman Empire disintegrated, called themselves the Roman Empire (today we call it the Byzantine Empire as its capital was Byzantium) and although they maintained Greek culture, called themselves Romans to the end.
The language of the ancient Roman emperors was Latin. Most also were taught Greek in their youth. Later in the empire, when emperors were born in the Roman provinces, they spoke the language of their birth place.
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.
In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.In total there were 178 Roman emperors. There were 81 emperors of the west and 97 emperors of the east.
Greek mythology was not a religion! If you mean the 12 Olympian Gods and Godesses, it was a Greek religon-like system adopted later by Romans who also changed some of these Gods's names, like Posidon-Neptun, Aphrodite-Venus, Hephestus-Vulcano,etc. This system was ended by the first Christian emperors.
Some Mesopotamian kings became emperors because of a few different reasons. These include the class systems, being seen as gods by the people, and claiming divinity themselves.
The first Greek Emperor was Octavian, or better known as "Augustus"
The language of the ancient Roman emperors was Latin. Most also were taught Greek in their youth. Later in the empire, when emperors were born in the Roman provinces, they spoke the language of their birth place.
Some nobles are always friendly to emperors because of the treatment they receive.
In short, No. Roman culture was heavily inspired by Greek culture and Emperors such as Hadrian tried heavily to integrate Greek culture into Roman culture.
No they did not the gods were the most important things ever back then
bananas are awesome
Ancient Rome had many, good emperors. Some of them were Augustus, Tiberius (yes, Tiberius, he left the empire in excellent financial shape), Claudius, Vespasian, Trajan and Hadrian.
yes, and no. Ancient Rome had a senate and they were in charge for some time, but they soon got emperors. Some of the emperors, such as Julius Caesar, wanted to become King, but he was killed. After that, they just stuck with emperors.
The number varied according to the desire of the emperors. Emperors such as Sui Wen Di (Yang Jian, around A.D. 7th Century) had only one wife, but some emperors had thousands of concubines
Emperors are like presidents because they are in control of at least some land and becaue they are on the same level.
No, there were good emperors who were biological sons of previous emperors. Titus for one. Some of them were designated as heir without being adopted and others were appointed by the military.
All Roman Emperors were famous in their own way. There were 192 people who claimed the title Emperor of Rome from 27 BC when the Emperor Augustus took control of the Senate until 1185 AD. Some of the later such would now be called Byzantine Emperors, but a the time they called themselves Roman Emperors. Second answer. Generally speaking most historians separate the ancient Roman empire and the Byzantine empire. The Byzantine empire lasted until 1453 AD when the Ottoman Turks took over Constantinople.