Union Major General Meade decided not to pursue Lee during his retreat. Meade figured that Lee losing over a quarter of his army was defeat enough. In doing so he lost his opportunity to crush General Lee's army and end the war early. When news, of Meade refusing to pursue the confederate army, reached the white house the sixteenth President of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, fired Meade because he was too cautious and missed the chance to end the war early.
The same constant problem would continue to continue. President Lincoln was simple too close to the battles. If Lincoln had ever commanded a large army, his advice to Meade may have been tempered. Lincoln consistently sought action from his generals, but his mistrust of their skills would only cause them to drag their heels. Meade knew that Lee had a good rear guard. The fact that Meade basically "saved" the Union from a terrible defeat" seemed to go unnoticed. If Lee had won, nothing would have stopped him from occupying a panicky Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. That Lee was even in Pennsylvania was an embarrassment in itself.
George McClellan, he was later fired for slow reaction time, hired back by Lincoln, then fired again for not doing anything when he had a chance to crush the Confederacy. And after he was fired I believe it was George Meade.
General George B. McClellan
You've got 'em scrambled. Hooker was commanding the Army of the Potomac, which was meant to stop Lee invading Pennsylvania. Just before Gettysburg, Hooker was fired and replaced by Meade. The 3-day battle was nearly won by Lee, when Pickett led his dramatic charge. But it failed and they retreated back to Virginia, leaving the Union to celebrate a famous victory in the same week as Grant's occupation of Vicksburg.
AnswerHowe
I am thinking it is General Robert E. Lee and General George B. McClellan. Not sure, but, heard from my teacher.
George McClellan, he was later fired for slow reaction time, hired back by Lincoln, then fired again for not doing anything when he had a chance to crush the Confederacy. And after he was fired I believe it was George Meade.
General George B. McClellan
Major General George Brinton McClellan.
George McClellan
General of the Union Army; fired by Lincoln for being too cautious
Lincoln fired several generals. He fired McClellan twice.
The Union had several field armies, including the Army of the Potomac. After McClellan it was commanded by Ambrose Burnside, Joseph Hooker, George Meade. When Grant came east he was made general in chief over all Union armies, but made his HQ with the Army of the Potomac and traveled with it. Meade remained in command of the Army of the Potomac, but had Grant right with him, supervising.
Yes - though he was actually G.G. (George Gordon) Meade. Joe Hooker was fired a few weeks after his terrible defeat at Chancellorsville, and replaced by Meade. It was only a few days before Gettysburg, and this victory went to Meade's eternal credit. He continued to command the Army of the Potomac till the end of the war, although his chief, U.S. Grant, travelled alongside him in a mobile HQ. Some say Meade, not Grant, should have taken the surrender of Lee at Appomattox.
Lincoln fired McClellan twice.
George McClellan, he was later fired for slow reaction time, hired back by Lincoln, then fired again for not doing anything when he had a chance to crush the Confederacy. And after he was fired I believe it was George Meade.
You've got 'em scrambled. Hooker was commanding the Army of the Potomac, which was meant to stop Lee invading Pennsylvania. Just before Gettysburg, Hooker was fired and replaced by Meade. The 3-day battle was nearly won by Lee, when Pickett led his dramatic charge. But it failed and they retreated back to Virginia, leaving the Union to celebrate a famous victory in the same week as Grant's occupation of Vicksburg.
General George G. Meade was placed in command of the Army of the Potomac and was asked to catch up to and defeat one of the best generals ever to come out of the USMA, West Point. He took over from a fired general, Hooker, and did become the victor. Yes he had more troops and Lee made errors. Meade took advantage of what he was given. He is perhaps the most underrated general Lincoln ever had. It is not unfair to consider how US Grant would have handled Gettysburg. Certainly, how would he have done any better? Grant was rarely undermanned in troops. The fact is that the navy gunboats and General Buell saved Grant at Shiloh. Halleck wanted Grant fired. There is a strong case to be made that Sherman would have been a better general in chief.