0
Why is it necessary to include bill of rights in the constitution?
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Because without the Bill of Rights we would have been a monarchy. The Bill of rights didnt do anything but list the rights we already had. We have certain inalienable rights given to us by our creator. They cannot be taken away unless you allow them to be. The Bill of Rights shouldn't have been called the Bill Of rights.. It should have been called "List of things the Government cannot do to its people" If it were called that then people wouldn't have been so confused today about what the Bill of Rights is. The US Government doesnt want their powers to be limited.., which is why soon, the bill of rights will be gone and they will have their new one world government i.e. their NEW WORLD ORDER. The US is falling apart and soon there will be a new revolution. Look it up, or else your not going to be ready when it hits the fan. Most of America wont even see it coming.
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agobecause the anti-federalists (one of the early American political parties) insisted that we include one into the constitution, otherwise they would refuse to ratify the new Constitution. Federalists such as George Washington promised that this would be the first thing put into the constitution as soon as it was passed. So the bill of rights was necessary to make the anti-federalists happy enough to ratify the Constitution
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did federalist and antifederalist disagree most strongly about?
Whether a bill of rights was necessary to include in the Constitution
What did the constitution not include?
the constitution did not include the bill of rights.
The anti federalists were troubled because the Constitution did not include a?
bill of rights
Why did the framers not include a bill of rights in the constitution?
Many of them simply didn't believe it was necessary. Because the original Constitution placed limits on the power of the government, many framers, such as James Madison, trusted that the people's rights were already sufficiently protected.
Are the Bill of Rights a part of the constitution?
No, it is part of the US Constitution. The Declaration of Independence stated that American colonies were free from British rule and included complaints against King George III. It did not include the Bill of Rights.
On what issue did federalist and anti federalist disagree most strongly?
Whether a bill of rights was necessary to include in the Constitution.
What did federalist and antifederalist disagree most strongly about?
Whether a bill of rights was necessary to include in the Constitution
Why was the constitution amended to include a bill of rights?
Why was the US Constitution amended to include all bill of rights
Why was the us Constitution amended to include the bill of rights?
Why was the US Constitution amended to include all bill of rights
Why was the us constitution amended to include a bill of rights?
Why was the us constitution amended to include all bill of rights
What did the constitution not include?
the constitution did not include the bill of rights.
Which complaint was greatest barrier to ratifying the constitution?
It did not include a Bill of Rights.
Why was the Bill of Rights a politically necessary addition to the Constitution?
A number of states demanded the Bill of Rights as a condition of their approval of the Constitution.
What do most state Constitution include?
The majority of state constitutions include some form of a bill of rights. Typically, they mirror the rights found in the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution.
When ratified the Constitution did not contain a Bill of Right?
In 1789 during the ratification process, the Constitution did not include a Bill of Rights.
What did george mason propose to include the constitution?
A Bill of Rights
In 1789 during the ratification process the constitution?
did not include a bill of rights
