Because someone who was born in Another Country, even though they have become an American citizen, might still have sufficient regard or affection for their mother country to put it's interests above ours. Michael Montagne
And also, because the Founding Fathers wrote this into the Constitution. The people have the power to change this requirement, and any other part of the Constitution. This power belongs to the people alone. Changes to the Constitution are not made by the President, or Congress, or even the Supreme Court.
On July 25, 1787, John Jay wrote in a letter to George Washington,
"Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen." Essentially, it seemed to make sense that, if one thing should be required of the president, he should have been born in the United States. Perhaps, in that time, non-diplomatic migration was more likely to be seen as potentially treasonous.
In the intervening years, several thorny issues have arisen. Alexander Hamilton, for example, might have been president had he not been born on Nevis in the Caribbean. Indeed, some have suggested that the requirement was put in to keep Hamilton from becoming President. George Romney, a presidential candidate in 1968, had been born to American parents in Mexico; it might have been a larger issue if his candidacy had gotten further. In 2000 and then 2008, John McCain's candidacy was questioned by some because he had been born in the Panama Canal Zone to military parents.
The general consensus is that children born abroad to American parents are natural-born citizens (though there are Supreme Court cases directly contradicting each other on this matter). Naturalized citizens, however, do not qualify. Some have noted that it is odd that naturalized citizens may serve in most governmental offices, just not the presidency or vice presidency. Some have pointed out that problems could arise if the first couple of positions in the line of succession were vacated, and the next in line had not been a natural-born citizen. Multiple past secretaries of state, for example, have been naturalized (notably Henry Kissinger). It is unlikely that this will ever be an issue, but it's enough for constitutional scholars to get worked up over.
The Constitution expressly requires that the President must be a natural born citizen of the United States, 35 years of age.
President of the United States
Yes- this is required by the US Constitution.
None. The US Constitution requires the President to be a natural born citizen.
Yes, it does. The US Constitution requires the President of the United States to be a "natural born Citizen", so the Austrian-born Schwarzenegger does not qualify.
Only a "natural born citizen" can hold the office of US President. See the related question below that gives the information from the Constitution that explains this requirement.
He or she must be a "natural born citizen"
The president must be born in US territory. Boris Stukov, the distinguished scientist who lives in Moscow, was born in Russia, I think.Boris Strokov was not born in the United states and was not a citizen when the Constitution was adopted. This is a requirement for anyone who is elected for President of the United states.The reason that Boris Strukov cannot be President of the United States is because he is not a natural born citizen on the United States. In order to be President of the United states, you must be a natural born citizen or have become a citizen prior to the adoption of the Constitution.
Yes, the Constitution specifically says the president must be at least 35 years old and a natural-born American citizen.
The president must be a natural born citizen of the US, be at least 35 years of age and have lived in the US for 14 years.
No. The US Constitution requires the president to be a natural born citizen of the United States. It also requires a president to be at least 35 years old and 14 years a resident of this country. So not only could a British citizen not be president, but even a British citizen who gave up British citizenship and became a naturalized US citizen cannot be president.
He's not a natural-born citizen, as required by the Constitution. He was not born in the USA. He is Austrian by birth.