0
They didn't particularly.
It was the Supreme Court, influenced by the elderly Chief Justice, Roger Taney, that interpreted the Constitution in this way. Taney reckoned that when the Founding Fathers had declared that a man's property was sacred, they would have included slaves in their definition of property.
So was the South that applauded this decision - strictly, it meant that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Did the south have slaves or the north?
The South had more than the North, and the abolishment of slavery began in the North. But the South wanted slaves - thus ensued the Civil War.
What was the primary goals of the civil war for the south?
they wanted to keep slavery in america whereas the north wanted slaves to be free and have equal rights. Abraham Lincoln was the president who wanted the slaves to be free
What were disagreements between north and south on the Mexican War?
the south wanted to keep the slaves but the north didn't.
What were the north's views about slavery?
the north's views on slavery were ngative and they wanted it abolished. that is why slaves went to the north when they ran away.
Why was the north reluctant to eliminate slavery?
The north wanted to eliminate slavery not for the beauty of the eyes of slaves but because the north was an industrial place, not like the agricultural south. The north wanted just to protect the union .
How did north count their enslaved people?
There was not slaves in the north. Discrimination, yes. Slaves, no.
What was the purpose of the three fifths compromise?
Although slaves couldn't vote, the Southern states wanted to count them for the purpose of increasing their representation in the House of Representatives. The Northern states didn't want to count slaves at all because the South insisted slaves were property and not persons. The Three Fifths Compromise was was just that...a compromise that allowed the South to count three-fifths of the slaves towards their total population which ultimately gave the South greater representation in congress than they would otherwise have had.
Did North Carolina want to count slaves as population?
Slaves were not counted in the population census in 1860 or 1870.
How did sectionals lead to the civil war?
Because the south wanted slaves and the North did not want slaves.
Why did US Civil War start?
It actually started because of States Rights to have slaves and other things like tariffs the north wanted higher tariffs and the south did not the north didn't want slaves the south wanted slaves.
Did the south have slaves or the north?
The South had more than the North, and the abolishment of slavery began in the North. But the South wanted slaves - thus ensued the Civil War.
What is the history of the three fifths compromise?
"The three fifths compromise was a compromise between south and north. They were deciding on how much a slave should be worth. South didn't want it to count as any and north did. So the government decided to make them worth three-fifths." This answer is completely backwards. Abolitionists wanted slaves counted as zero for apportionment. No one ever said they were only 3/5 of a person. The South, not the North, wanted to count ALL their slaves because they would get a disproportionate amount of congressional representatives to their favor, which would allow slavery to continue unhindered. Another argument was to force the South to acknowledge slaves as people if they wanted them counted, so if they were people, how could they continue to own them as slaves?
How sectionalism helped to lead to the Civil War.?
Because the south wanted slaves and the North did not want slaves.
What issues led the north and south to go to war?
The south, or Confederates, were fighting to break away from the other states, so they could have their own government and have slaves. The North, or Union, wanted to keep the states together without having slaves.
How did the compromise of 1850 attempt to deal with the most difficult issued concerning slavery?
The South wanted to count slaves a people but not give them any rights. The North was more for rights, but if no rights, then no count. The government (House of Representatives) is filled by counting people in the State. So the compromise agreed upon fractionally counted Slaves as people with rights. Didn't give slaves any rights, but didn't give the Southern states all the power they wanted.
What were the different views towards slavery between North and South?
The overall majority of the South wanted slavery to continue. A number of the slaves wanted to remain where they were. As the war neared its ending the slaves joined the North by joining the North by fighting with them. Slaves used the house system going house to house and continuing to travel North.
What was the 3 to 5 ratio for counting slaves?
It was a result of a compromise between the North and the South. The North wanted slaves to be counted for taxation purposes in the South to bring in more revenue for the federal government which was something the South did not want. But the South wanted to count slaves towards in population in terms of representation so they could have more members in the House of Representative which the North did not want. In the end they settled upon the idea that each slave counted as 3/5 of a person, both in terms of taxation and representation.
