Fittingly the Nazi's were brought to justice in the Nuremberg Trials.
By, Husky Pratt
On the side of the Axis Powers the answer is no, it was a war of expansion to get, as Hitler put it "breathing room".
For the Allies (not including USSR and USA) the answer would be maybe, it was a war about alliances to Poland as well as Hitler making a fool of Chamberlain.
For USA and USSR the answer is yes because they were dragged into the war by the aggressor states attacking them. (the question about the use of atomic weapons being justified is another matter)
Yes. It wasn't only necessary, it was unavoidable. Adolf Hitler would keep on expanding in Europe until the world is at his knees. Something must be done to stop him. Japan would still expand in Asia and the Pacific Ocean with or without Hitler, so one way or the other, World War Two would errupt.
World War Two was a global conflict which affected every major continent. The United States played a decisive role in this war, providing the weaponry and shipping which made victory for the Allies possible. There was little confusion about whether or not the war should be fought, after the attack on Pearl Harbor. Europe was occupied completely, except for the British Isles, and Japan had overrun the Pacific Basin, much of Asia, and China. Ultimately, the United States would have been forced to fight for its survival, no matter what happened. Considering the atrocities commited by the Japanese in China, and the pogrom against the Jews in Europe, the moral high ground involved stopping these governments from killing more people.
Because the bad guys were obvious to everyone, and they truly were bad men. They were so unacceptable to the allies, that the Allies gave them an ultimatum: Surrender or be DESTROYED!
There were no other options.
To put it simply: no. Japan waged a war of expansion at the expense of its neighbors, and they were the primary aggressor of war in the Pacific.
They were attacked on US soil.
cheese burgers
Ermm .. I can only think of a few. 1) Hitlers words and actions. 2) Chamberlains policy 3) Japans attack on Manchuria 4)the failure of the Treaty of Versailles Hope this helped.
Suzuki was opposed to war with the US.
The main actions between the main adversaries, for which the world should be grateful for, was that an all out nuclear war did not happen.
dick ? i think ? i might be wrong.
No, since noine should be afraid to voice their own opinion
The United States wasn't at war with Japan in WW1.
See the related links below for a comprehensive explanation about Japans actions in World War 2.
Answer this question…Both countries engaged in the mass killing of innocent people in conquered territories.
Better than a hot war.
Emperor Hirohito.
World War.
How do japans actions before and during world war 11 compare with hermanys action over the same period
yes
Japan had an Emporer.
General Tojo
USA
racism, resouces, revenge