The English were so well because they were a world power. They had strong armies and were successful in many other areas as well. You will see this if you view a map from the time period they controlled America, they controlled many other areas as well.
There are several reasons for the success of British colonies in America. Many settled in areas that were abundant with fertile soil and Natural Resources. The Joint Stock Company, which outfitted many of the early colonies, was an economic success for the owners of the companies and the colonists who obtained passage and start-up necessities from the Company. Once established, the colony would have a ready made market for its products. New England provided fish and lumber, two important ingredients for a successful British economy. The British, prior to the French and Indian Wars, let the colonists alone. While there were Navigation Laws enacted to regulate the colonies, the British practiced the policy of "salutary neglect." As long as the colony was making a profit, smuggling and other violations of the Laws were overlooked. Also, the British welcomed all nationalities and most religions to the colonies. As long as rules were obeyed and the Laws respected, French, Spainish, prisoners, lower classes, etc. were allowed to come to America and settle in the British colonies.
There were more English colonies than French, so it wasn't so much they were more successful is that there were just more. In Canada there were more French trappers than English and that did effect the relationships with the Native Americans and exploration.
Because they were very friendly with the Native Americans and taught them about Thanksgiving.
They had more interest in long-term settlement.
C. The English attempted to create long-term settlements.
the English sent more colonists
People came from everywhere in Europe. There were Germans, Irish, Scottish, Swede, Italian, Dutch, to name a few.
English. They left the fledgling US for British colonies because they remained loyal, so it stands to reason they felt more British than American.
Although the British colonies started later than both the French and Spanish, it quickly outpaced both in North America. The English colonists were better fed, clothed, and housed than their counterparts. One reason for this was that the French and Spanish colonies were characterized by strong central control exercised by the monarchy. It helped them to get off the mark quickly, but in the end hindered innovation and their ability to deal with changing circumstances. Both the French and Spanish empires were vast. The English colonies were tightly grouped along the Atlantic coastline. This provided them with communication and transportation benefits.
The first permanent colony was Jamestown. While it did not prosper in the beginning it was the first colony never to be completely abandoned. During and after the leadership of John Smith things started to look up for the colony, and while it hit a few more major stumbling blocks it eventually became a successful enterprise
The English was not the first to start colonization of the new world, however they adopted joint ventures (which shared the cost and risk) barbies! & private propety rights to individuals which enabled them to bypass the Spanish and French. french barbies!The Spanish model was based on extracting the wealth from the colonies and storing it back in Spain, barbies are so from spain! a more mercantalist approach which is based on getting rich by making another poorer. barbies could be poor soemthimes if u make them!This Spanish model was not successful as the capitalistic approach adopted by the British. and then barbies played happly on there island!
The French did not settle in the Middle Colonies of America. The Middle Colonies were predominantly settled by English, Dutch, and German immigrants. The French focused their colonial efforts more in present-day Canada and regions along the Mississippi River.
The children were becoming more Dutch than English and the Dutch weren't as strict about what to do and not to do on Sunday's as the Sepratists.
It was English tea on English ships. The smugglers who brought in Dutch tea at a cheaper selling price were upset because the English had LOWERED the taxes on the English tea making their tea more pricey. This is why it was thrown into Boston Harbor (not the myth about higher taxes). Hamilton had a hand in it since he was one of the largest smugglers of Dutch products in the colonies.
the French settlements in North America was slower than English colonies because the English colonies had more slaves
Spain and France reached out further, claiming more area, than Britain and needed more resources from those colonies to support their massive effort to take still more colonies while managing the ones they had. Also, the Spanish were unusually brutal for the period and created more rebellion over that brutality.
The more southern colonies.
Because more land could be farmed
with the diversity came tolerance for religious and cultural differences
Historical success can be measured in different ways. The Spanish colonies were more successful in terms of territorial expansion and extraction of resources, while French colonies were more focused on trade and cultural assimilation. Overall, both colonial empires had their own unique strengths and weaknesses.
The English and Dutch merchants had more powerful and faster ships, joint-stock companies and cheaper ships.
Simply put: trade. The few small colonies they set up (later New York one of them) were basically trading posts. Fur was the thing they were most after, just like the French and English elsewhere. Keeping up those 'colonies' turned out to cost more than the fur trade generated in income. The Dutch were therefore far from unhappy when a peace treaty with the English legalized the earlier English conquest of New Amsterdam, but offered the Dutch Surinam in return with its possibilities for setting up very profitable sugar plantations.
Erik is a dutch name derived from the germanic. In the Netherlands Eric or Erick is also common (which is more English).