0
The rebellion in 1786 and 1787 was stopped by Massachusetts militia and troops assembled by Massachusetts governor James Bowdoin, led by General Benjamin Lincoln.
The federal government had no money to hire troops, a weakness of the Articles of Confederation that was among the many reasons for the drafting of the US Constitution. Because some ringleaders went into hiding in the Republic of Vermont, the rebellion added impetus to extend federal law there, and Vermont became a state in 1791.
What else can I help you with?
How did the whiskey rebellion end differently than shays rebellion?
The Whiskey Rebellion ended differently than Shays' Rebellion primarily due to the response from the federal government. In 1794, President George Washington led a militia to suppress the Whiskey Rebellion in Pennsylvania, demonstrating the federal government's ability and willingness to enforce its laws. In contrast, Shays' Rebellion in 1786-1787 was largely met with state-level resistance, and the lack of a strong federal response highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Ultimately, the resolution of the Whiskey Rebellion reinforced federal authority, while Shays' Rebellion spurred calls for a stronger national government, leading to the Constitutional Convention.
Who is actions demonstrated the inability of the federal government under the Articles of Confederation to protect the citizenry from armed rebellion or provide adequately for the public welfare?
Daniel Shays (Shays's Rebellion)
How did shays rebellion show the weakness of federal government?
Shay's rebellion was during the time the States were under the Articles of Confederation the Federal Government was not existent until the Constitution.
Why did Shays's Rebellion prompt a call for stronger central government?
Shay's Rebellion was caused by farmers with major debt. This rebellion showed that the government under the Articles of Confederation was to weak because of the fact that the government was not able to prepare an army. Without the army, Shay's Rebellion went out of hand until the rich were able to get together and pay to make an army. People finally realized that the government needed to have more power in order to do such things like making an army.
Why didn't Daniel shays rebel against the government?
Daniel Shays did, in fact, lead a rebellion known as Shays' Rebellion in 1786-1787. The uprising was a response to economic difficulties, high taxes, and aggressive debt collection practices that affected many farmers in Massachusetts, including Shays himself. The rebellion aimed to protest these injustices and sought to reform the government, particularly to prevent the foreclosures of farms. Ultimately, Shays and his followers were suppressed, leading to increased calls for a stronger federal government.
Shays Rebellion in 1787 was an attack on?
the new federal government
The significance of Shays's rebellion is that it?
It began the growth of the federal government.
How did the national government respond to shays rebellion?
They could offer little help to Massachusetts.
Was the government stronger as a result of the whiskey rebellion and shays rebellion?
Yes, both the Whiskey Rebellion and Shays' Rebellion ultimately strengthened the federal government. The government's response to these uprisings demonstrated its ability to maintain order and enforce laws, thereby enhancing its authority. The successful suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion, in particular, affirmed the federal government's right to levy taxes, while Shays' Rebellion highlighted the need for a stronger national framework, leading to the Constitutional Convention and the creation of a more robust federal system.
How did the whiskey rebellion end differently than shays rebellion?
The Whiskey Rebellion ended differently than Shays' Rebellion primarily due to the response from the federal government. In 1794, President George Washington led a militia to suppress the Whiskey Rebellion in Pennsylvania, demonstrating the federal government's ability and willingness to enforce its laws. In contrast, Shays' Rebellion in 1786-1787 was largely met with state-level resistance, and the lack of a strong federal response highlighted the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. Ultimately, the resolution of the Whiskey Rebellion reinforced federal authority, while Shays' Rebellion spurred calls for a stronger national government, leading to the Constitutional Convention.
How might the Shays Rebellion have influenced the writers of the US Constitution?
Shays' Rebellion led some to the believe that the U.S. Constitution should create a more powerful federal government. The rebellion was led in part by Daniel Shays.
Who is actions demonstrated the inability of the federal government under the Articles of Confederation to protect the citizenry from armed rebellion or provide adequately for the public welfare?
Daniel Shays (Shays's Rebellion)
What problem did Shays's Rebellion reveal?
The articles of condederation were inadequate and we marveled a powelful federal government.
Which aspect of the government formed under the article of confederation was best highlighted by Shays's rebellion?
Ah, Shays's Rebellion highlighted the challenges of a weak central government under the Articles of Confederation. It showed how the lack of a strong federal military and the inability to levy taxes directly impacted the government's ability to maintain order and respond to crises. This event ultimately led to the realization that a stronger federal government was needed, paving the way for the Constitutional Convention.
How did shays rebellion show the weakness of federal government?
Shay's rebellion was during the time the States were under the Articles of Confederation the Federal Government was not existent until the Constitution.
Why did Shays's Rebellion prompt a call for stronger central government?
Shay's Rebellion was caused by farmers with major debt. This rebellion showed that the government under the Articles of Confederation was to weak because of the fact that the government was not able to prepare an army. Without the army, Shay's Rebellion went out of hand until the rich were able to get together and pay to make an army. People finally realized that the government needed to have more power in order to do such things like making an army.
What did the people want after shays rebellion did they want a lager economy?
I think they wanted a more powerful government Maybe they also wanted a more powerful economy As far as I know Shays Rebellion just showed that the government under the articles of confederation was powerless because it gave states the power not the over all government. As a result of a powerless government, federal troops had trouble controlling the rebellion. Today we have the constitution which the federal government for power then the state government.
