Alexander Hamilton argued for the ratification of the Constitution by emphasizing the need for a strong central government to maintain order and stability in the newly formed nation. He believed that the Articles of Confederation were too weak to effectively govern, leading to economic turmoil and vulnerability to external threats. In his writings, particularly in the Federalist Papers, Hamilton argued that a robust federal system would promote both unity and prosperity, safeguarding individual liberties while allowing for effective governance. Ultimately, he contended that the Constitution would create a government capable of addressing the nation’s challenges and securing its future.
The Federalist written by John Jay, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton
The major argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the Constitution
we needed a central voice to represent america
False. This was an example of loose construction and one of the first major uses of the "necessary and proper" or "Elastic Clause" of the Constitution.
it had features that prevented the abuses of government powers
it had features that prevented the abuses of government powers
it had features that prevented the abuses of government powers
C. Senators would be elected by the state legislatures.
The Totten clan agreed in ratifying the constitution they immigrated from Scotland to the Americas for hope. This resulted with many followers
One argument raised by opponents of ratification of the Constitution in 1787 was the concern that it created a strong central government that could potentially infringe on individual liberties and states' rights. They feared the absence of a Bill of Rights would leave citizens vulnerable to government overreach. Additionally, they argued that the Constitution favored the wealthy elite, undermining the principles of democracy and representation for ordinary citizens.
The Federalist (later known as The Federalist Papers) is a collection of 85 articles and essays written (under the pseudonym Publish) by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay promoting the ratification of the United States Constitution.
NO. The Anti-Federalists who opposed the US Constitution were angered that the Constitution gave too little power to the states and too much power to the federal government.