Government

Yes. In the early stages of American government each state was required to write up their own constitution and Bill of Rights so that the power was given to the states. This changed when the U.S. Federal Government decide to have an umbrella Constitution that applied strict, "Must Follow" rules for the states. They still let the states decide upon certain details, such as alcohol legality, but many decisions were now controlled by the Federal Government instead of the State Government.

a centralized executive authority

When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787 the delegates represented thirteen little independent nations, each a former British colony. They were loosely bound together by the Articles of Confederation, which had proved to be unsatisfactory in the type of central government authority it created. The delegates were to create a new governmental system for these thirteen independent nation-states. All governmental power rested in the capitals of the thirteen little nations, except that to loosely coordinate a national military policy.

But the delegates were jealous of the governmental power that each of their little nations had, and leery of surrendering any more of that power to the new central government they were trying to create than was absolutely necessary. They worried that a central government might favor one section over another, or help one section at the expense of another. They wanted a new central government that would be strong enough to be effective, but no stronger. They wanted the new government to have enough power to do the things which were best handled collectively for all the thirteen nation-states, but no more power than that. Things like defend them all together from foreign attacks, to make treaties with other nations on behalf of all of them deliver the mail.

The delegates created the US Constitution we still use today. In it, they spell out specifically what powers the new national government they were creating was to have. In order for this new Constitution to take effect, it had to be approved by each of the thirteen little nation-states. Some members of state governments were concerned about thing that were not in the new Constitution, so they insisted that these principals be added before they would ratify the new Constitution, so the "Bill of Rights", the first ten Amendments to the text of the Constitution was added. The Ninth and Tenth Amendments say that the Federal Government had ONLY those powers specifically given to it by the new Constitution, and no more, not one bit more, and that any powers not SPECIFICALLY given to the new government by the Constitution were still in the hands of the states. These Amendments are still right there, in the Bill of Rights. They just have not meant much since 1865, when the Union won the Civil War. Before the Civil War the Federal government was small, with few employees, and rarely a factor in the life of most people. Most people never saw any sign of the Federal government's existence beyond their local postmaster. The Civil War marked a massive shift of government power in the US, from the state capitals to Washington DC. The Federal government, since the war, is the predominant one, and its power has grown continuously since, until today the people think nothing of the Federal government having its nose in every aspect of their lives. The Constitution still says this is not how things are supposed to be, and this was the reason those Amendments were in the Bill of Rights to start with - to prevent to growth of an all-smothering central government. But the forces of a strong central government won the Civil War. They try to distract the people by claiming the war was all about slavery, but that was only a peripheral issue. The real issue was immediately, keeping people and their territory in a nation where they no longer wanted to be, and the shifting of power from a decentralized, local arrangement to the central government. This was something nobody had agreed to, and which in fact our Constitution says, to this day, is not supposed to be.

meaures governments put in place to protect consumers from abuse

Positive consiquences of limited national government meant that states could not do what they wanted.

Negative meant no united goals.

i don't know is the answer cuz it does not even make sense so i am so confused about this question.

no, you just recently went to the website. YOU were not a criminal mind who is trying to hack

The Government Accountability Office (GAO formerly the General Accounting Office) is a legislative branch agency that answers to congress.

Each state has state government because Arizona wouldn't know what's best for Maine, and vise versa. (that was an example) It's because not every place is the same and has different needs and whatnot.

Home Rule

isolation registration sheet

CHINA

It is legitimate for local and national government agencies to use taxpayer's money to help export. The reasons for this are that exports improve the balance of trade position of a country. The country that exports gets access to foreign exchange resources required for importing essentials. The exports help the county sell its excess production capacity and enhance the potential for global expansion by local companies. Exports help the country stabilize fluctuations in market demand. Every national and local government is interested that its businesses gain a global market share. It brings in a positive flow foreign exchange. It helps exploit indigenous technology to its fullest and helps increase sales and profits of the exporting firms. It is for this host of reasons that local and national government agencies use taxpayers' money to helps small companies export and make them competitive in the global market.

To buy online go to the website of Standards, UK

The state government.

A government consisting of two parts

The Religious Freedom Restoration Act

democratic government insist on institutions as it is not practical for all people of democratic government to sit together everyday and take decisions on all matters .Institutions coordinates and distributes work in such a way that everything works out nicely.

Communism has no government, as it has no classes, no money, no coutries.

eBay. The pantyhose you seek are a brand called "Platino". Similar brand is "Tamara" (what the Hooter's girls wear).

North Korea, Myanmar and Cuba are totalitarian states. China to a lesser extent can be lumped in there as well.

Sulla, who was consul in the final year of the social war between Rome and her allies in 88 BC, eventually was appointed dictator in 81 BC, after the civil wars he fought against Marius. He executed and estimated 9,000 of his opponents. He also carried out sweeping institutional reforms.

They stayed in power because they had strong armies and people supported them

Pay attention in class .:)

Yes.