What observations did the doctor make about the effects of the bomb?
The doctor observed that the bomb caused widespread destruction and significant injuries among the population, with many individuals suffering from severe burns and trauma. He noted the psychological impact on survivors, who were left in shock and distress. Additionally, the doctor remarked on the overwhelming number of casualties, which strained medical resources and highlighted the devastating consequences of such weaponry on human life.
Why did Henry L Stimson decided to use the atomic bomb?
Henry L. Stimson, the U.S. Secretary of War during World War II, supported the use of the atomic bomb primarily to expedite Japan's surrender and bring a swift end to the war, potentially saving countless lives on both sides. He believed that using the bomb would demonstrate overwhelming military power, thus compelling Japan to capitulate without the need for a costly invasion of the Japanese mainland. Stimson also thought that the bomb's deployment would strengthen the U.S. position in post-war negotiations and deter future aggression from other nations.
What technologies do you think make arson and bomb crimes easier to accomplish successfully Why?
Technologies such as timers, remote detonation devices, and incendiary accelerants can make arson and bomb crimes easier to accomplish successfully because they allow perpetrators to set off the devices from a distance and with precise timing, reducing the risk of being caught in the act. Additionally, advancements in online resources and tutorials make it easier for individuals to access information on constructing and deploying such devices.
What response did people have to the Atomic age In other words how did people's lives change?
People were optimistic at the start of the Atomic age. They thought all power generators would be atomic from then on.
CHECK IN INITIAL BRIEFING RECORD KEEPING AND DEMOBILIZATION PROCEDURES ARE ALL NECESSARY TO ENSURE?
accoutibility
No, Truman never even began to consider such a thing. Truman's main priority following the use of Atomic Bombs in WW2 was to see that they never be used again. In fact the only orderTruman ever issued on his own initiative (not just a continuation of orders and policies determined by FDR) during WW2 about the Atomic Bomb was to stop the bombing when Japan sent their intentions to surrender on August 14, 1945 (by this time Los Alamos had already finished the third Atomic Bomb and shipped it to San Fransisco, when it arrived in San Francisco on August 18, 1945 it was returned to Los Alamos because of Truman's order, instead of being flown to Tinian to prepare it to drop on Japan).
Note: the Manhattan Project had the factories built and operating and production plans scheduled to make a total of 23 Atomic Bombs to drop on Japan before the end of 1945, if necessary. Not just the 2 used.
When was the first military bomb disposal robot made?
The first military bomb disposal robot, known as the "PackBot," was developed in the late 1990s by iRobot. It was specifically designed for the U.S. military to safely disarm explosives and was first deployed in combat in 2003 during the Iraq War. Prior to the PackBot, various other robotic systems were experimented with, but this marked a significant advancement in bomb disposal technology.
What was the name of the two planes used to drop the bombs?
The atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? That was the Enola Gay. If your question was something else then I don't know the answer.
How did atomic bombs change the perspective of warfare?
All of the following material is readily available from pubic sources. - B Sentry
The nuclear weapon age gives us an incredible capacity to change this world, for better or worse, as technological developments tend to do. Since World War II nuclear combat has been planned for in all major warfare doctrines. Russia, it should be noted, makes no distinction between regular, biological, chemical or nuclear weapons combat. They have no top echelon inhibitions in their training doctrines to make the use of nerve gas, lethal plagues, or nuclear weapons restrictive in use, or only as a last resort, as many claim their chemical weapon use during their previous extended military invasion of Afghanistan demonstrated. Their stockpile of nuclear weapons is what forces us not to intervene. Allow me some further elaboration.
Nuclear combat is obviously much different than the other two
'illegal by treaty' forms of non regular combat. Nuclear warfare doctrine, and nuclear age politics, have not just altered our perception of war winning strategies. It has altered the worlds methods of taking over defenseless and weaker countries, by richer more powerful ones. First a little should be said about the history of nuclear weapons to give a point of reference.
In world war II Hitler had a Heavy Water project, which meant collecting deuterium and tritium (Water molecules of Hydrogen and Oxygen with some Hydrogen atoms with 2 or 3 Neutrons, instead of the usual one) into a concentrated mass to experiment with radiation. Radiation physics work would teach about heavy elements, such as uranium. America began its own studies, because Albert Einstein sent a letter to the president warning of the potential war changing use of a nuclear powered bomb, in which atoms from heavy elements might be split, releasing massive energies. Thus, an 'atomic' bomb. In time this included the use of an atomic bomb as a trigger to power the fusion process for a Hydrogen bomb, which can have a thousand times the power of the earlier atom bombs. Instead of splitting large radioactive atoms, it involved putting hydrogen atoms together, thus taking advantage of natural physics that required less 'nuclear glue' per atom, releasing the excess as unconfined plasma energy.
In the U.S. efforts, named the Manhattan Project, America eventually built centrifuges and collected enough of the less common Uranium (weight 235) to produce 2 atomic bombs. In 1945 the warhead components were carried by the U.S. Navy heavy cruiser Indianapolis to be assembled into a warhead for the attack on Japan. First on Hiroshima and a few days later, the city Nagasaki. U.S. General Douglas MacArthur was against the use of these bombs, but seemingly the British crown convinced president Truman to use both weapons, to imply that we had an unlimited number of these bombs, but two was enough to make our point.
The horror of the blast, from the utter destruction to he radiation effects upon the populace, permanently changed the world view of large scale warfare. No longer could armies collect in massive nation destroying formations, because one bomb could destroy them all. Naval fleets could be destroyed if even one nuclear warhead got thru the defenses. The doctrine known as Mutual and Assured Destruction (MAD) was quickly foisted upon the world by various think tanks, led in a large part by the public 'arguments' of the British 'philosopher' and mathematician Bertrand Russell, and the doctrine became the standard balance of power. The argument was, if Russia attacks America, we will both be 'wiped out. The same Bertrand Russell had earlier campaigned for 'Operation Dropshot', wherein America was to preemptively 'nuke' Russia, but that was before Russia was given the secrets to building their own nuclear weapons. Historically Russell was now the 'father of the Peace Movement' and thus the 'cold war' began. Russia pushes here, European powers push there, each taking over control of pieces of the world, but no one willing to seriously provoke a hot war against the other.
This insanity was to be eliminated by President John F. Kennedy at his speech in Dallas, Texas wherein he was to call upon the nations scientists to design a defense against nuclear attack. That speech was never made.
In March 1984 however, U.S. President Reagan made such a speech which included a plea for the world's scientists and engineers to develop a laser defense system to shoot down all incoming missiles. The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI) was led by Lt. General Abrahamson in the Pentagon, and was nicknamed Star Wars by the media. The media severely suppressed its highly successful tests and many alleged experts declared it to be impossible to construct. These 'experts', such as Dr. Hans Bethe, had in earlier years used the same mathematical skills to 'prove' that ICBMs were impossible to construct as a successful weapons system. The U.S. Department of State toured Europe claiming the SDI would only protect America, although President Reagan repeatedly insisted it was to destroy any missile headed for any country. Russia was intensely upset by the chance that America might be able to stop a nuclear attack, and immediately riled against it through every conceivable route, though themselves massively increasing their own laser defense efforts.
Stopping all out nuclear war. The SDI research proved that Particle Beam weapons could be immensely capable in the anti-missile capacity, as opposed to the the exceedingly dubious HIgh Frontier orbiting hand grenades approach of the retired General Danny Graham group. The difference in the approach is essentially: Rather than trying to intercept a missile with another missile, once you find the target, a beam weapon instantly strikes it, and you will never run out of beam pulses, and they cannot be intercepted or tricked. Yet 30 years later the 'political destruction' of the Beam Weapons program seems complete. America has no significant defense against ICBMs, and the world still lives under the doctrine of nuclear combat, and pretends Russia will never take the risk of nuclear war. Treaties are expected to protect the free world, just as the British ambassador Chamberlain's treaty with Hitler protected Europe until the invasion of Poland.
How secure are we?
Regarding the Strategic Arms LImitation talks, which were designed to maintain the MAD doctrine: Russia made massive bombs in 20 megaton categories, and America made smaller more accurate weapons. Russia constructed many thousands of nuclear warheads, even greatly exceeding American numbers. Russia consistently violated the Strategic Arms LImitation Talks fronted by then U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. It is also a fact that Russian arms talks personnel have zero authority to make the Russian leadership stick to ANYTHING in the treaties, and so the talks were always a waste of time, and just for political show. A really important fact is that while Russia practiced massive Civill Defense, and anticipated surviving a full scale nuclear attack given some weeks for civil defense preparation, America in the same time frame spent a total of $50,000 for the total annual national Civil Defense program. It's obvious American leadership was ignoring the risk.
This current circumstance has led to a new world changing political structure.
Lesser Developed Nations (LDC's as per the U.S. State Department acronym) have, since the nuclear weapon age, become aware of the fact that America can not be depended on to intervene against Russia, nor more recently against China, for fear of triggering a war between the major powers. China has for decades been building a nuclear arsenal to get in the game. As far back as the 1970's China was sending students to American universities to learn about atomic theory and engineering.
So the overall result seems to have been, The weak countries are at the mercy of powerful ones, and have no real hope of the major powers stopping each other from irrational treaty breaking invasions. America will no longer assist a country that has been claimed by an enemy nuclear power. With the MAD doctrine in effect, the world powers have often turned to economic destruction of LDC's, having no fear that America will intervene in their defense. The claim that a country might build nuclear warheads, is even used as a White House excuse to invade and destroy the industrial and economic capacity of 'Lesser Developed Countries'. No LDC will be allowed to have nuclear power to electrify their nation, thus ensuring they will be severely crippled in attempts to produce their own capital industrial base, and will be forever forced to rely on the developed countries for technology, and oil. The major world banks will continue to enforce the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World bank policies that starve developing nations into submission and guarantee their poverty and enslavement. The prevention of capitalization in the form of industries, the restriction of electrical capacity by eliminating safe modern nuclear power plant construction, the 'appropriate technologies' as defined by the ethics of the United nations food programs, and the suppression of technological advances in general including even such things as the artificial heart and the manned exploration of other planets, have created a static world power structure. With the threat of nuclear retaliation. there is no recourse for the human race but to sit under the oppression we have today. We let evil empires push the boundaries, because we won't dare to confront them with more than words. Militarily confronting a new version of 'Hitler with nuclear bombs' would be unthinkable.
That seems to be the overall result of how nuclear weapons have altered the course of the world.
"That decapitalization, slavery, depopulation and death travel always together is a fact whose proof is to be found in every page of history … By forbidding the application of labor, talent, or capital to any thing but agriculture - forbade advance in civilization." - Henry Carey 1858
What actors and actresses appeared in The Last Atomic Bomb - 2006?
The cast of The Last Atomic Bomb - 2006 includes: Sakue Shimohira as herself Koichi Wada as himself
Who was the first to use the term atomic bomb?
The author H. G. Wells in his book The World Set Free, published in 1914 before the outbreak of World War 1.
When and where did America drop atomic bombs?
What was the nationality of the men who invented the atomic bomb?
Only one man invented the atomic bomb: Leo Szilard, a Hungarian Jew. He did it in 1933 while crossing a London street while trying to think of more efficient ways to transmute elements. He patented it in 1934. But it took 12 more years, several discoveries, millions of calculations using both sliderules and electromechanical punchcard machines, and the work of thousands of men and women from dozens of nations to construct the massive industrial infrastructure needed to begin making them.
Did the pilot who dropped the atomic bomb survive?
Yes, every pilot of every plane that has ever dropped either atomic or hydrogen bombs either in combat or as a test survived! Some have died since then though on missions unrelated to nuclear weapons, accidents, or old age.
Who was the US group that built the atomic bombs?
The Manhatten Project was the orginization that developed the atomic bomb.
Is there any atomic bombs that where preserved from world war 2?
There are atomic bomb casings that remain from the 1945 to 1948 period, but most (if not all) were probably built postwar. There were only four functional atomic bombs actually built prior to the end of the war and three of those were detonated (gadget, little boy, fatman), leaving only one (unnamed) actual world war 2 atomic bomb remaining after the war. This bomb was either detonated later in one of the nuclear test shots or its special nuclear materials were recycled to make newer more efficient/safer atomic bombs by 1949. Also the conventional explosives used in the explosive lenses of world war 2 implosion type atomic bombs (composition b, baratol) are much too unstable for use in weapons intended for long term stockpiling.
Several museums preserve atomic bomb casings, a few are:
Another thing to be aware of is that not all apparent "fatman" casings exhibited in museums are really atomic bomb casings, some are pumpkin bomb casings (a pumpkin bomb was a large conventional blockbuster bomb used for practice drops by atomic bomb crews, several were dropped on Japan prior to the actual atomic bombings, they weighed the same and had the same size and shape as a real MK-III), and others are mockups built specifically for the exhibit.
In 2003 I visited several museums with atomic bomb casings, that year none of them had little boy on exhibit. I found out why in one museum where they had replaced the little boycasing in the exhibit with a sign that stated all of them had been removed from museum exhibits to be modified to remove one external feature still classified top secret!!! So even if it is a real period casing, it may not appear as it did originally as parts may have been removed or modified for security or other reasons.
What course of action did szilard favor?
Szilard favored the course of action to deploy the atomic bomb as a demonstration of its power to the Japanese leadership in order to compel their surrender, rather than dropping it on a populated city like Hiroshima or Nagasaki.