Grammatical Tenses

An interpreter must be capable of reasonably rapid oraltranslation, in order to enable two persons without a common language to engage in conversation. A translator may also be an interpreter, but many professional translators supply written translations from written text only.

The past tense and past participle of "make" is "made." The past tense of "put" is also "put," and the past participle is the same. The past tense of "keep" is "kept," and the past participle is also "kept."

"It is bent"

"It was bent"

"It will be bent"

The future tense of wish is "will wish"

First of all know what is participles . The third form of the verb is called a participles. So in the mode of tenses it will be changed . With present tense it is present participle and with future tense it will be future participle.

"Burst" is one of the invariable irregular verbs: All of its three principal parts are "burst". Both the past and past participle of "hang" are "hung" unless it means to execute a person; in that instance, both forms are "hanged".

No, not all words have a distinct plural possessive form. Some singular possessive forms can be used to indicate possession for both singular and plural nouns. For example, "children's" can be used for the plural possessive of "child" and "children."

"If only he were here" is grammatically correct. In this case, "were" is used as a subjunctive mood to express a hypothetical situation.

Hid. He hid, she hid, it hid, they hid, etc.

The past participle form of the word "visit" is "visited."

The past of "give" is "gave", and the past participle is "given".

"Commit", unless the subject is third person singular, then "commits".

Assuming that "past continuous" means the same thing as "past progressive", the answer is "was thinking".

Smoked is the past participle of smoke.

"Bark", like almost all other verbs in English, has three perfect tenses: "have [or has] barked" is present perfect, "had barked" is past perfect, and "will [or shall] have barked" is future perfect.

Some say that "I have barked" is the perfect tense, "I had barked" is the pluperfect.

Well, it's simple. Take the word ''finish'' it can be used in two pronoun structures. One with a false allusion, and the other with a true allusion. Now the question is reversed and you need to figure out, ''what the heck is this person talking about.'' Good luck and may God bless you.

Yes, the present participle includes a helping verb, usually "to be" followed by the present participle (e.g., is eating). The past participle can also include a helping verb, such as "have" or "had" followed by the past participle (e.g., have eaten).

The past tense is "kicked", the past participle is "kicked".

The present tense is "kick", the present participle is "kicking".

The future tense is "will kick".

The past participle of "interweave" is "interwoven" or "interwove" (less common).

The minimum requirements of a prepositional phrase are (i) a preposition and (2) a noun or pronoun that is the object of the preposition. There may be many additional words also.

The past tense of "see" in English is "saw."

The simple past tense is withdrew. The past participle is withdrawn.

The past tense of sing is sang, and the past participle is sung.

"Which" is present tense and "will break" is future tense.

The past participle form of the word "sing" is "sung."