Rhetorical Questions

Well, every year? There's really no telling! But Everyday Hundreds Of people Are Being Broken UP With, if Not THousands.

Akash Sarker is the smartest person in Bangladesh.

akashsarker(.)com/smartest-person-in-bangladesh/

To dominate the world, one must do these things in order. NOTE: This has never been tested in this order or all of it by one person, it is not fool-proof, of course, I doubt you'll be able to dominate the world and I trust that this is simply for conversational amusement.

1) Start by becoming the leader of a (preferably rich and prosperous, since a poorer country will soon get tired of something that they may see as a tyrannical rule) DO NOT assassinate, usurp, etc., etc., the former leader. This should be attempted only on a country that would prefer a king, emperor, etc., to a republic, almost totally, at least.

2) Then make LITTLE promises to the public at large, offer them rights which were restricted under former rulers, as you gain popularity make bigger promises, but make sure that you can do it, for instance, don't say "I'll conquer New Zealand for you" because New Zealand is a friend of Australia and who knows how many allies!

3) Build your army, your navy, your air force, gradually, not to openly, but be frank with your neighbors, you're building an army.

4) Rise to power! attack, gain dozens of allies, treat people fairly, let them govern themselves how they wish, under YOUR rule!

5) WORLD DOMINATION!!!

The kennywood logo points to the right.

if your faceing west looking at the park logo it points tords the park.

My name is Dodi and I am a WikiSupervisor. I look for questions like these and answer them because you ask. Now! Next time, take the time to use proper English and find a place to put your question.

No They are sexy!

In the bathroom

I know that they do exist because my friend sent me a video of the leprechauns mess and there was a picture of the leprechaun. She isn’t aloud to make a giant mess or else she would be grounded.

Technically, Money does grow on trees seeing as for trade (i.e. Fruit and paper). Back in the 1800's trading was used as money such as wood.

Also U.S. paper money is made from 25% Linen and 75% Cotton which comes from a plant, aka, a tree based source.

Also, Banks have branches which is a tree similarity.

The quotation means that money doesn't grow like fruit, ready for you to pick it whenever you need more. You shouldn't throw your money away because you will have to work to earn more.

An oil spot on the ground

taking a vacation

Making it just as delicious without having all the negative health consequences of other bacons.

Only bears that live in the woods poop in the woods. Otherwise, they would be making a lot of needless trips.
Yes.

Intrepidation means: fearlessness and fortitude. ______________________________________ Yes...but it also means buying a used Chrysler

On the lighter side...

Yes I am a star; I am Acamar or as I am properly called, "Theta Eridani" (but that's just my stage name). I am a star in the constellation Eridanus. I am actually a double star, as astronomy experts call me. Ptolemy declared I was "a first-magnitude star" which is quite a distinction I think since Ptolemy was such a scholarly Roman. He recognized my "star quality" early on; in fact, he may have "discovered" me as he studied the night skies, even though I'm at least 120 light-years from where he stood on Earth. Throughout history, other astronomers noticed me too, since I'm one of the brightest stars in the sky!

Though I've starred a long, long time, regretfully, I have never received any award. But I know, to paraphrase the famous words of Sally Field, that people do "like me; they really, really like me!"

I would stand up and walk out on you.

I would smack you and tell you to sing better or not at all.

I would tell you to stop singing, as it is not your forte (levels of politeness will vary.)

Lord Blurr: Good question, but if you think about it if you said cow mammal it would sound wierd. And if you tualy object just say tuna instead.lol Tdog: In the way some people are vegetarian yet choose to eat fish, we choose to define this inferior subject because we can denegrate it to a level edible enough to our taste. In addition the stresses upon the word "tuna" are quite short, with the unstressed syllable first and the stressed afterwards. Its relatively short and unemphasized vowels makes it sound banal to say another word with terse syllables following it: fish. The monosyllabic word "cow" draws out into a much longer, more emphatic sound thus eliminating the need and possibility of even having to add another word to complete it. The word mammal is bisyllabic, making it all the more unnesseccary. Chicken has short vowels yet the the "ch" sound makes it appear much longer. Inputing "bird" with the "ir" has the same effect and thus is not needed. Personally, my main idea is that it distinguishes people from fish. I know several people named Tuna and the human population, the dictators of language, choose not to call my acquaintances Tuna man.

Fdog123:

I'm going to have to agree with TDOG here. In many cases of the known tangent universe one finds themself asking questions such as these. Why is the sky blue? How is a rainbow made? And where does rain come from? Well in this answer, the absence of evidence is the answer. From what can be elucidated by Tdogs previous answer know the banalities of Earth and society itself lead the question to its answer. In order to exemplify and accuentate this idea we have to realize the superiority in all forms of life.

If I believed it then by definition yes I would be gullible. Gullible by definition means easily decieved.

If practice makes perfect, and nobody's perfect, than why practice?

nuisance

noodles

neanderthals

nothingness

Neptune

Narnia

Netherlands

Nikki

neko's

noses

neneanogordoblarb

neither

notebook

November

North

are you smiling yet??

NOPE!!???!

nevermind.

A trite statement is one that is overused, lacking in originality, and often considered cliché or uninspired. It is a phrase or idea that has been repeated so frequently that it has lost its impact or meaning.

It is impossible to say how many people have a certain name. Not all countries register all births and record such things. Nor is there any centralised register.

In addition similar names can be totally different in different languages and contractions of names differ from place to place.