Robotics

Yes, robots can operate independently without human intervention, especially those equipped with advanced artificial intelligence and automation technologies. These autonomous robots can perform tasks such as navigation, data collection, and even decision-making based on pre-programmed algorithms or machine learning. However, human oversight is often necessary for monitoring, maintenance, and ethical considerations.

It's not actually 'taught'. The scientists write a computer program to tell the rover what to do - and send the program by radio to Mars. The rover receives the program, and follows the instructions.

Robots are programmed machines designed to perform specific tasks, often with precision and efficiency, while humans are biological beings with complex emotions, consciousness, and the ability to think critically and adapt. Unlike robots, humans possess creativity, intuition, and social skills, allowing for nuanced interactions and innovative problem-solving. Additionally, robots lack the capability for self-awareness and moral judgment, which are intrinsic to human experience. Overall, the fundamental differences lie in emotional depth, cognitive flexibility, and the capacity for ethical reasoning.

Natural robots, such as humans and other sentient beings, can be viewed through the lens of social contract theory as entities that possess inherent rights and responsibilities within a societal framework. The social contract theory posits that individuals consent, either explicitly or implicitly, to form a society and adhere to its rules for mutual benefit. In this context, natural robots contribute to social cooperation and moral considerations, emphasizing the importance of recognizing their agency and welfare in constructing ethical societal norms. Thus, acknowledging natural robots within social contract theory underscores the need for inclusive governance that respects their rights and promotes collective well-being.

determine the chemical composition of rocks and soil on mars.

If it was it would have been done by now.

Mechanical devices that generate movement are called actuators, but you could go a lot simpler with examples... what about a motor? That's the whole point, right? A washing machine creates movement as well, even though it doesn't go as far as the motor of a car or plane or even lawnmower. :) There are tons of devices. Think of machines that move, and you will come up with many.

Warfare, carrying heavy equipment, doing jobs like construction, security, police, and many, many, more

Scientists sometimes accomplish great things.

As a scientist, you have the potential of advancing human knowledge, and possibly solving important problems which will benefit the human race significantly. If you are successful, you will be very well-respected by society, in general.

There is a chance that you will be able to invent things that will have great commercial value and will make you wealthy.

There is a chance of winning the Nobel Prize or other prizes which are also lucrative. Scientific work can be deeply satisfying.

The drawbacks would include the fact that success is not guaranteed, and your chosen line of research may prove to be unproductive. Your personal ability may not be up to the task; science often places extreme intellectual demands upon whose who pursue it. Just as not everybody is capable of becoming a professional football player, or a movie star, it is equally true that not everybody is capable of becoming a successful scientist.

No.

What you're referring to would be called a humanoid(=human-shaped) robot, and those are actually quite rare. Most robots today are industrial robots, and they look entirely different.

No robots will not do your homework for you. They are not smart enough.

In a hostpital

4

• A Robot must have a purpose or two
• A Robot must be able to move (anyway , remote control)
• A Robot must have some updated technology in this way i mean it could plug in to the computer and you can control it from there
• It must have some Ability (to see take pictures)

Isaac Asimov is remembered for proposing what he called the three laws of robotics, however, he did so as a science fiction writer; he never designed any actual robots. Nonetheless, he is the best candidate as the first person to write robotics rules. At the present time, various forms of robots do exist, but they do not conform to any specific set of robotic rules. Robots are built for specific tasks and are designed to do those tasks without reference to any broader rules.

no because robots are made of metal and machines. they are in fairytales that robots have hearts or movies such as

It means you're a machine that is controlled by others and has no thoughts of its own.

he is the first person to make a robot.

clean 4 u

wall-e

anything that is remote control do not copy this stupid crap