answersLogoWhite

0

🎒

Roman Numerals

Questions and answers related to the symbols used by the ancient Romans to represent numbers. These include the numerals: I, V, X, L, C, D and M.

14,167 Questions

What do you mean by commercial products?

well commercial products is really thing like doritos or phone commercials where the consumer presists that his/her product is best.

How would you actually work out 1999 plus 1666 in two different ways and 1999 minus 1666 in two different ways but working out all four calculations entirely in Roman numerals from start to finish?

Due to changes made to the rules originally governing the Roman numeral system, introduced during the Middle Ages presumably to make it more compatible with the Hindu-Arabic numeral system that was gradually superceding the Roman numeral system in Western Europe at the time, nowadays because of those changes 1999 is now condsidered to be MCMXCIX but back in ancient Rome the equivalent of 1999 was probably IMM which is an abridged version of MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII thus facilitating the speed and ease of the above calculations as follows:-

IMM+MDCLXVI = MMMDCLXV => (2000-1)+1666 = 3665

MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII+MDCLXVI = MMMDCLXV => 1999+1666 = 3665

IMM-MDCLXVI = CCCXXXIII => (2000-1)-1666 = 333

MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII-MDCLXVI = CCCXXXIII => 1999-1666 = 333

Note that the above calculations are fairly simple and straightforward but for more complicated calculations the ancient Romans would have use an abacus counting device.

QED

Why do people use Arabic numbers rather than Egyptian and Roman numbers?

So-called Arabic numerals make it possible to perform mathematical operations, like division and subtraction, unlike the clumsy Roman numerals which were only useful for stating numbers, not for crunching them. For one thing, Arab numerals include the zero, which Roman numerals do not.

Where is Roman numerals used this days?

Roman numerals can still be found on such things as... clocks and watches, sundials, old mile stones, the dates in the credits of movies, dates in books, sequals of movies (Jurassic Park III etc), the names of chemical compounds (such as Iron (II) chloride), the regnal numbers of kings and queens (Edward VI etc), and on some coins.

What are 26 simple facts about numbers from A to Z?

Above the solidus line of a fraction is its numerator

Beneath the solidus line of a fraction is its denominator

Composite numbers have more than two factors

Decimals are numbers are less than 1 and begin with a decimal point

Even numbers are divisible by 2 with no remainders

Factors are numbers that are divisible into other numbers with no remainders

Greatest common factor reduces fractions to their lowest terms

Hindu-Arabic numerals are: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 and 9

Irrational numbers can't be expressed as fractions but rational numbers can

Just add 1 to 12 to make a baker's dozen which is 13

Kilo means a thousand which is 1,000

Lowest common denominator/multiple is needed when adding or subtracting fractions

Multiplying or dividing fraction don't need a common denominator

Negative numbers are less than zero and begin with a minus sign

Odd numbers when divided by 2 always leave a remainder of 1

Prime number has only two factors which are itself and one

Quarter of 1 is 0.25 as a decimal, 1/4 as a fraction and 25% as a percentage

Roman numerals are: I V X L C D and M

Square number is the product of a number multiplied by itself twice as: 5*5=25

Two is the only known even prime number

Units are from 1 to 9

V as a Roman numeral equals 5

Whole numbers or integers do not have fractions or decimals attached to them

X as a Roman numeral equals 10

Years and major sporting events are often notated in Roman numerals

Zero is the most important number of them all because it tells us as for example that 207 is different from 27

What are the two methods of adding together 8.5 and 9.5 entirely in Roman numerals?

In Roman numerals 8.5 = VIIIS or SIX and 9.5 = VIIIIS or SX

So: VIIIS+VIIIIS = XVIII => 8.5+9.5 = 18 or octodecim in Latin

And: SIX+SX = IIXX => (10-1.5)+(10-0.5) = (20-2) or duodevginti in Latin

Note: 2*S = I, 5*I = V and 2*V = X

Values: X = 10, V = 5, I = 1 and S = 1/2 or 0.5

QED by David Gambell

How would you subtract 999 from 1776 in two different ways with all work shown entirely in Roman numerals?

Notwithstanding todays modern conversion of 999 into Roman numerals which are now considered to be CMXCIX inasmuch that the ancient Romans probably would have subtracted the equivalent of 999 from 1776 in either of the following formats:-

A: MDCCLXXVI-IM = DCCLXXVII => 1776-(1000-1) = 777

B: MDCCLXXVI-DCCCCLXXXXVIIII = DCCLXXVII => 1776-999 = 777

QED

What is 1776 plus 99.5 added in two different ways and 1776 minus 99.5 subtracted in two different ways but showing all work and final four answers completely in Roman numerals?

The requested calculations that were probably worked out as in Roman times are as follows:-

MDCCLXXVI+SC = MDCCCLXXVS => 1776+(100-0.5) = 1875.5

MDCCLXXVI+LXXXXVIIIIS = MDCCCLXXVS => 1776+99.5 = 1875.5

MDCCLXXVI-SC = MDCLXXVIS => 1776-(100-0.5) = 1676.5

MDCCLXXVI-LXXXXVIIIIS = MDCLXXVIS => 1776-99.5 = 1676.5

Note that the way we now work out Roman numerals today had absolutely nothing to do with the ancient Romans whatsoever because the rules now governing the Roman numeral system were introduced during the Middle Ages.

QED

How would you add together 1776 and 49 in two different ways but showing both calculations entirely in Roman numerals from start to finish?

In todays modern configuration of Roman numerals 49 is now considered to be XLIX but the ancient Romans would have probably added the given numbers in either of the following formats:-

A: MDCCLXXVI+IL = MDCCCXXV => 1776+(50-1) = 1825.

B: MDCCLXXVI+XXXXVIIII = MDCCCXXV => 1776+49 = 1825.

For more complicated calculations the Romans would have used an abacus calculating device.

QED

How do you write the standard number -75.116 in exponential notation?

Negative numbers cannot be written in exponential notation. The rules require the number to be between 1.0-9.9.

Why is it that 223 plus 1776 in Latin numeracy is equal to MCMXCIX instead of the more plausible IMM?

The Roman or Latin numerals for 1776 and 223 are MDCCLXXVI and CCXXIII respectively. Therefore in accordance with today's rules governing the Roman numeral system they add up to MCMXCIX (1999).

But during the Roman era these numerals would have been calculated on an abacus counting device as:-

MDCCLXXVI + CCXXIII = MDCCCCLXXXXVIIII and probably have been simplified to IMM (-1+2000 = 1999) in written form.

The reason why MCMXCIX is chosen instead of IMM is presumably to make it easier to convert them into Hindu-Arabic numerals and vice versa.

What numeric system does not use 0?

The Romans had no numeral for zero. But later, during the middle ages, monks who still wrote in Latin and used Roman numerals introduced the symbol N (representing the Latin word Nullae) for zero.

Why did they create Hindu Arabic numerals?

For the same reasons that we need a numeracy system today which is based on the Hindu-Arabic numeral system that was a lot easier than the Roman numeral system that it replaced.

Related word for numerical expression?

Not really sure if it's what you're looking for, but an equation usually consists of two numerical expressions separated by an equal sign.

How would you actually subtract 444 from 1999 in two different ways entirely in Roman numerals with step by step details?

before we show how to subtract in roman numerals, let's check the answer first.

1999 - 444 = 1555

1999 = MCMXCIX

444 = CDXLIV

1555 = MDLV

if we separate them into each digit:

1999 = M/CM/XC/IX

444 = 0/CD/XL/IV (0 is just there as a placeholder so each has 4 "digits")

1555 = M/D/L/V

And after this, we realize why people stopped using roman numerals and went with the superior hindu-arabic numerals. It just works.

What is the numeral for CCXCLXIV?

These numerals can't be converted into Arabic numerals because the positional place values of them are incorrect.

But rearranged as: CCCLXXVI they would equal 376.

What is 1776 plus 1499 and 1776 minus 1499 but working out both calculations entirely in Roman numerals with explanations?

Nowadays we would convert 1499 into Roman numerals as MCDXCIX which does not lend itself quite easily for the purpose of arithmetical operations but there is historical evidence to suggest that the ancient Romans would have worked out the equivalent of 1499 in an abridged format of IMD thus facilitating the speed and ease of both calculations as follows-

MDCCLXXVI+IMD = MMMCCLXXV => 1776+(1500-1) = 3275

MDCCLXXVI-IMD = CCLXXVII => 1776-(1500-1) = 277

Note that if we were to arrange MCDXCIX as M+CD+XC+IX then they too would add up to IMD.

QED