Scientific Method

All is possible, until proven wrong

yes

ANALYZE

no

1.make a observation

2.ask a question

3.create a hypothesis

4.test a hypothesis

5.collect data and anylasis

6.form a conclusion

As more and more data is collected and evaluated on a topic, scientists' theories or hypothesis may change based on the new information.

Every thing could go wrong and someone can get hurt?

No

1) ask a qestion

2) form a hypothesis

3) observaction/resaech

4) test hypothesis/experiment

5) anlazy data

6) draw conlusion

Verification. You can't consider something a "scientific discovery" just because one individual (or group) claimed something.

Collecting materials is the first step when conducting a briefing.

yes

smoke bud

The first step in posing a question is to clearly identify the topic or issue you want to inquire about. This involves narrowing down your focus to ensure that your question is specific and relevant. Once you have a clear understanding of the subject, you can formulate your question in a way that encourages thoughtful responses or exploration.

The unit method simplifies problem-solving by breaking down complex tasks into manageable units, making it easier to understand and calculate. It enhances clarity by allowing individuals to focus on one unit at a time, reducing the risk of errors. Additionally, this approach fosters a systematic way of thinking, which can be applied across various disciplines and scenarios, promoting consistency and accuracy in results.

hypothesis

There are a great many pseudo-scientific ideas that are circulating in our world. Immanuel Velikovsky wrote a book called "Worlds In Collision" in which he worked out in great detail how the planet Venus had been ejected from the planet Jupiter, of which it had once (supposedly) been a part, and how by passing close by the Earth, Venus caused various anomalous events which had been reported in the bible as miracles, such as the rain of manna in the desert, during the exodus from Egypt (supposedly, the Venusian atmosphere reacted with the Earth's atmosphere to produce manna). Nothing in this book has the slightest scientific validity or plausibility, yet it is all presented in the guise of a scientific theory, claiming to be scientific. Hence, it is pseudoscience.

Nothing. A hypothesis is just a guess as to a possible explanation of something. If it's wrong, it's wrong. No big deal.

If you still desire to explain the thing, you should develop a new hypothesis.

gather imformation

doctor homi bhabha

1. Develop a hypothesis (a "what if" statement) based on observations and research. (Most people mistakenly call this a "Theory", but it's not)

2. Do your best to prove that your hypothesis is wrong. (Nope, it is NOT to prove it right the way many believe).

3. Invite others to "test" your hypothesis by trying to prove it is wrong.

Example: Based on what I have seen, tested, and measured, I say that the 50-50 mixture of strawberry ice cream with chocolate ice cream produces grey ice cream. I used Dreier's ice cream in my tests.

I will try to prove that hypothesis as wrong, wrong, wrong by redoing the tests and using new tests. I get the same results.

I will invite others to prove that my grey ice cream hypothesis is wrong by doing THEIR tests and measurements.

When I publish the results, I am forced to modify the hypothesis or give up on it because everyone else's tests and observations of many brands of ice cream show that a mixture of strawberry and chocolate ice cream is close to grey, but not exactly. Darn!

to increase friction on the snowy land.due to this it would be easier to ride in snow areas

Scientists use the Scientific Method to acquire new knowledge by experimenting, observing, and recording. It is the basic order of gaining new information.

Characteristics of scientific methods are following:

1. Science is Objective

2. Science is Empirical

3. Science is Public

4. Science is systematic

5. Science is predictable

7.6x10-8