Tigers

Yes lion can kill 100 tigers I'm alireza, l'm sure a lion can kill 100 tigers.

approximately 1000 are killed due to pollution, you youngsters have to do something about it mainly for the next gen to see the tigrs

That depends on the size and breed of the horse. A large draft horse like a Percheron is much more powerful than a Bengal or even a Siberian tiger. However, a smaller horse like a Mustang may be equivalent to a large male Siberian tiger.

tiger
The Bengal Tiger is the largest and heaviest cat in the world.

Koalas are herbivores which eat eucalyptus leaves. Their front teeth, which they use for nipping off the leaves and gum blossoms, are quite sharp. Their molars, however, and flat and strong for chewing the leaves.

they are used for hunting and in china they use it to make medicen

blue as the sun.

The Italian striped-bug and the orange assassin bug are examples of black-striped, orange-bodied bugs. The former (Graphosomea lineatum) numbers among the world's pentatomids, or nutrient-rich xylem and sugar-rich phloem sap-sipping shield bugs. The latter (Pselliopus barberi) represents the Reduviidae family of beneficial, pest-eating insects.

Tigers are predators that eat meat. While I don't know of a specific instance of one tiger eating another, it's not impossible.

Generally speaking, tigers would much rather hunt deer or rodents, since they don't fight back as much as another tiger would. But, if all other food sources were gone, and a tiger was faced starvation, it would definitely consider attacking another tiger and eating it to survive. Such an event would be the very last resort when no other options were left before death.

So to be specific, tigers are not "cannibals" since it is not something they would do normally. The situation would have to be very extreme.

yes! because it is really huge,bold and takeovers so many powerfull animals.

Depending on the individual Tiger, between 55 and 60 kph, but only for very short bursts, unlike the ability of a Cheetah to sustain top speed (110 - 120 kph).

The population is estimated to be below 2,000. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tigers

No.They are found on different continents.Besides, tigers could kill gorillas.

Lions are native to Africa, leopards are also native to Africa but tigers are not native to Africa.

No. It has a violin shape on its upper torso (head). Its brown and its legs are spread out wide. Its hella fast!! Very hard to catch and very aggressive. Here is a great site: ideasforteachers.wordpress.com/category/classroom-displays/

Yes, male tigers have a penis for the same reason that most male mammals have a penis: to serve as the urogenital organ.

Yes, tigers are the most powerful of the big cats. But leopards are capable of amazing feats of strength, able to carry animals that weigh three times the weight of the leopard into tall trees.

The hawk is what people say, regarding that it can fly and is fast. But in the fairy tail of the tortoise and the hare then the tortoise would win because it has more brains and is not so full of itself.

it really depend on when the female get its period..but usually, as far as i know, it could be at age 12 After she begins ovulating for the first time. Usually between the ages of nine and twelve. She will ovulate for the first time without knowing it and approximately 28 days later will menstruate for the first time, so a girl can technically get pregnant before getting her first period.

No. I don't think so... ^~^

during the late Pleistocene period in the last ice age.
In the Ice Age The last of them became extinct about 10 thousand years ago.
The subfamily Machairodontinae (saber toothed cats) evolved about 23 million years ago, during the Oligocene series, which is part of the Paleogene system. They became extinct about 10,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene series, which was part of the Quaternary system. All of these times were part of the Cenozoic period. The last of them became extinct about 10 thousand years ago.
The subfamily Machairodontinae (saber toothed cats) evolved about 23 million years ago, during the Oligocene series, which is part of the Paleogene system. They became extinct about 10,000 years ago, at the end of the Pleistocene series, which was part of the Quaternary system. All of these times were part of the Cenozoic period.

This was said by Tipu Sultan the emperor of Maisoor (A state in Subcontinent). It is said when one preferred to his own way instead of living on someone else's terms in return on some big benefits.

it depends on what type of cat and its strength. bobcat? lion (considered a cat)? plus it depends on the human. wimpy skinny kid? strongest man in the world? if you ask a more specific question then maybe you'll get a better answer.

The most abundant species of tiger at the moment is the Amur, or Siberian tiger, which is also the biggest in size. The others, which are the Indian, Bengal, and Indonesian tigers, are much lower in numbers and are barely clinging to survival. Even the Siberian tiger is endangered to the hundreds. These creatures really need some help getting back on their feet because the Chinese are hunting them for their body parts because they are ingredients in many traditional medicines that don't even work. Also, their habitat is getting destroyed and people are hunting them for killing livestock and people. It makes no sense to me. The people are the ones encroaching on their territory and driving all of the prey the tigers usually eat away or hunting the prey as well. They are the ones forcing the tigers to turn to other means of survival, and their blaming the tigers? They need to blame themselves for their actions and give some territory back to the tigers.