Uniform Code of Military Justice

no

Being late for duty is primarily addressed under Article 86 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), which pertains to "Absence Without Leave" (AWOL). Specifically, it covers the unauthorized absence of a service member from their appointed place of duty. While being late may not constitute AWOL, repeated instances can lead to disciplinary action under this article or other articles related to conduct and performance. Commanders also have discretion to address tardiness through non-judicial punishment or administrative actions.

Article 92

true

to determine the advance of an attacking unit

TRUE

A soldier would not only be justified it would be his duty to disobey an unlawful order.

congress

You can find that under article 134. UCMJ Fraternization policies do not apply to people in the Individual Ready Reserves. Those rules are mostly for active duty enlisted and officers. It is found in Article 92, UCMJ, and fraternization is prosecuted or dealt with as an orders violation. The fraternization rules apply to the Reserves and National Guard. Those in the IRR are not generally considered to be covered by the fraternization rules unless they are put in a recall or AT or similar duty. This is to prevent officers from getting involved with enlisted in their chain of command. It is also intended to prohibit certain relationships between enlisted personnel who are in each others chain of command and between officers in the same chain of command.

Reprimand

The UCMJ is the Uniform Code of Military Justice. Article 91 of this code is directed towards the insubordination toward a warrant officer.

Article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) addresses the failure to obey an order or regulation. It makes it an offense for military personnel to fail to follow lawful orders, regulations, or instructions issued by a superior officer. Violations can lead to disciplinary action, including courts-martial. The article underscores the importance of military discipline and the necessity of adhering to commands for effective military operations.

Staff judge advocates and legal officers.

The burden of proof for possession of a controlled substance under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) is beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that the prosecution must prove to the court that the accused's possession of the controlled substance is established with a high level of certainty before a conviction can be made.

There are 134 Articles in the Uniform Code of Military Justice, of these 88 are non-punitive.

Article 91 could be addressed;

891. ART. 91. INSUBORDINATE CONDUCT TOWARD WARRANT OFFICER, NONCOMMISSIONED OFFICER, OR PETTY OFFICER

Any warrant officer or enlisted member who--

(1) strikes or assaults a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer, while that officer is in the execution of his office;

(2) willfully disobeys the lawful order of a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer; or

(3) treats with contempt or is disrespectful in language or deportment toward a warrant officer, noncommissioned officer, or petty officer while that officer is in the execution of his office;

shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

OR.... Article 134, the "General Article"

934. ART. 134. GENERAL ARTICLE

Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.

It depends on who "you" is. Article 7 gives apprehension authority to military and naval law enforcement officials. Article 8 authorizes state/local police officers to apprehend deserters, only.

Yes and no, the military can recall you if you are suspected of having commited an offense while you were on active duty. The offense must be Courts-Martial level. They cannot recall you to give you an Article 15. Other than that scenario, no, you will not fall under UCMJ.

aparently YES. THAT WOULD BE PUNISHABLE UNDER ARTICLE 92, FAILURE TO OBEY A DIRECT ORDER FROM A NCO, IVE BEEN PUNISHED BY IT A COUPLE WEEKS AGO, IDK WHAT IS THE RESULT OF THE TRIAL YET.

by used of temples

In a criminal trial (e.g. a Court-Martial) the burden of proof is the same as in state and federal criminal law. The burden is the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused committed each of the elements of the charged offense.

It is a Court Martial offense in the military, and would result in discharge under less then honorable conditions as a minimum. It could also result in a considerable jail term. While the above response is essentially true, there are some other important details to be discussed. First, courts martial for desertion are rare, as demonstrating that a service member has left the military with either a) the intent of never returning or b) the intent of shirking hazardous duty is challenging. In the recent wars, only those folks who have fled the country for Canada and have subsequently been deported to the US have been tried for desertion. That said, courts martials are generally avoided and discharges for AWOL/UA under Other Than Honorable (OTH) conditions are fairly common. But again, this depends on the branch of the service and how long the member has been absent.

They used Poison gas, we had the creeping barrage.