WW1 Trench Warfare

i think it is because of the fury between the two countrys over a pice of land i reackon it didnt need to happen waht was it for the is no reason for vilance or unhappness JUST OVER A STUPID PIECES OF LAND !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!thats what i think

From Brittany Jane Smith

Edit: WWI began over an assassination. But Brittany is right in a way. The Austrians did want some land from the Serbians, if I am correct, but it may be the other way around. After the Archduke of Austria was assassinated, Austria took that time to declare war on Serbia, and Russia declared war on Austria, and so on and so forth.

The geographical feature of northern France that made it particularly well suited for trench warfare was the Hindenburg line, which was built in the winter of 1916-1917 by German forces, and was a German defensive position that was the last line of defense for them during the first World War

It depends on what country your from.

For the US the first battle would be Pearl Harbor Dec 7 1941.
For China it would be July 7, 1939
For Britain and France it would be September 1, 1939

The Germans advanced to quickly with little planning of what they would do when they gained ground. They had lost many men as had the Allies however, the allies had American back-up coming where as Germany was wearing thin with troops surrendering and mutinying.

The tone of "Suicide in the Trenches" by Siegfried Sassoon is one of anger, sadness, and disillusionment. The poem criticizes the senseless waste of young lives in war and expresses a deep contempt for the failure of authority figures to protect and care for their soldiers. The overall mood is somber and reflective, highlighting the devastating impact of war on young soldiers.

chemical warfare was prevalent , later outlawed by the Geneva convention

A primary source on trench warfare during World War 1 could be a diary or letter written by a soldier who experienced it firsthand. These personal accounts provide direct insight into the conditions, emotions, and experiences of individuals in the trenches. Other primary sources could include photographs, official war reports, and war-time documents such as soldier's orders or field manuals.

It's unknown how many didn't explode but an estimated 30% of the 1,500,000,000 shells fired along the Western Front were duds. They are still finding unexploded munitions in France and Belgium. It's called the "Iron Harvest" and every year about 900 tons of unexploded munitions are uncovered.

Since 1945, over 600 French bomb disposal personel have been killed removing the rusting bombs and shells.

Moose are large and powerful animals, and their primary defense against enemies is their size and strength. They have long and sharp antlers that they can use to fend off predators and competitors. Additionally, they are strong swimmers and can escape from danger by diving into water bodies. Moose are also known to be excellent runners, enabling them to outrun potential threats.

A ridge is a long, elevated landform consisting of a series of hills or mountains that are connected. It is typically formed by tectonic activity, such as the collision of tectonic plates. A trench, on the other hand, is a long, narrow depression in the ocean floor. Trenches are usually formed where one tectonic plate is subducted beneath another, creating a deep and steeply inclined boundary.

Barbed wire revolutionized warfare by providing a cheap and effective means of fortification. It obstructed movement, making it difficult for soldiers to advance or retreat and providing cover for defenders. Barbed wire made trench warfare more prevalent and significantly increased the defensive capabilities of armies, making it difficult to breach enemy lines.

No Man's Land was a term used during World War I to refer to the area of land between the opposing trenches of the Western Front. It stretched across Belgium and France, from the English Channel to the Swiss border.

If a soldier was wounded and fell in mud during battle it is quite possible that they would drown if not rescued. This happened to many soldiers at Frommelles and Paschendale. It was always difficult and dangerous for stretcher bearers and other soldiers to rescue wounded men who were out in 'no mans land'. Because of this many men would be left until night or a time when it was safer to move out and collect them. You have to remember that at times there were hundreds of wounded soldiers laying in the mud. It was rare for a soldier wounded in their own trench to drown in mud. Even in battle there was always a mate nearby to drag them out of mud or water.

Yes, barbed wire is used in the JA ranch. Barbed wire is commonly used in ranching and farming to create boundaries and contain livestock. It helps to prevent animals from wandering off or entering restricted areas.

Yes, generals did visit the front lines during World War I. Although they often stayed behind in headquarters to coordinate operations, many generals recognized the importance of firsthand knowledge and would occasionally visit the front to assess the situation, boost morale, and provide leadership. However, these visits were often brief due to the dangerous and volatile nature of the front lines.

Generally, the defender had the advantage in trench warfare. Defenders benefited from being well-entrenched, with the advantage of cover and protection. They were also familiar with the terrain and therefore could plan and execute defensive strategies more effectively. Additionally, defenders usually had easier access to supply lines and reinforcements compared to attackers.

One debatable aspect about the lost battalion is whether the commanding officer, Major Charles Whittlesey, made the right decisions during the battle in the Argonne Forest during World War I. Some argue that he made strategic mistakes that contributed to the battalion becoming surrounded and trapped, while others argue that the circumstances and challenges were beyond his control. Another debatable aspect is the extent to which reinforcements and support were attempted or available to rescue the battalion. Some argue that the U.S. military did not do enough to rescue the trapped soldiers, while others argue that efforts were made but were ultimately unsuccessful.

The film 'Battle of the Somme' was used as a propaganda tool during World War I to rally support for the British war effort. It aimed to depict the realities of trench warfare and the heroism of British troops. The film was highly successful and became one of the first documentaries to reach a wide audience.

The area between the trenches on the Western Front during World War I was commonly referred to as "No Man's Land." It was a devastated strip of land filled with barbed wire, shell craters, and other hazards, making it extremely dangerous for soldiers to cross. It was a deadly territory with little to no control by either side.

Sapping referred to the method of digging tunnels underground to undermine enemy lines or defensive positions during World War 1. It allowed troops to approach their targets unseen and launch surprise attacks. Tunneling, on the other hand, specifically referred to the practice of constructing tunnels by specialist tunneling companies for various purposes, such as mining beneath enemy positions to plant explosives. Both tactics were used by both sides to gain an advantage in trench warfare.

When speaking of the speed of tanks, first you should categorize which era of tanks. Tanks come in the categories of WWI, WWII, and Modern Tanks.

The WWI tank, mainly the Mark IV British tank, were the first of their kind. Considering that it was based off a tractor and was one of the first tanks ever, it would obviously come with flaws. One of these was a speed of four miles per hour. An average soldier could run faster.

The WWII tank increased in speed and included the rotating head, a contribution from the French. It traveled around eight miles per hour.

The current tank has increased in mobility. It can now move through much rougher turrain. It has a speed of 25 miles per hour.

Hope that could help!

Animals DO have the ability to rationalize HOWEVER their brains are not set up like humans. I know that Elephants and Whales have larger brains than humans so it should NOT be surprising at all for them to be able to rationalize a lot better than humans. The problem with most animals is that they go more in emotion or instinct rather than rationalization. There was a news report of a pig that risked its life to save its human family from a burning house. People tend to say animals are inferior and etc but that is not true at all. Animals and humans are pretty much the same. The only difference is that humans tend to rationalize a lot more than other animals.

Not only does this answer not make sense but it is arbitrary. One's love for animals or his emotional need to take care of them is neither a case for rationality in non-human animals, nor their equality to man nor that they have emotions past pain and pleasure.

Rationality (not 'rationalization' btw) is not measured by brain size.

Emotion is not the equivalent of instinct.

The pig's intention can never be proved.

Here are some facts:

Unlike humans, no non-human can willingly and knowingly act toward its own destruction.

This proves the unique power of volition (choice) in man.

With the power to choose comes the power to judge. Which choice is best.

Best for what? Man's life.

Best to whom? The man choosing.

The part of us that does this judging is our Faculty of Reason. Our rational mind.

A very hungry, healthy dog is incapable of refusing viable food available to him. He eats because it is both pleasurable to eat and painful if he does not.

He certainly won't refuse it because he is overweight. LOL.

Modern warfare is a grey area. Most people would accept the definition to be when machines were used in war as opposed to men and horses etc. By that definition the start came about towards the end of WW I. Any war after that could be classed as an example of modern warfare.

fvbfdggruie uh78 87 789 87 78 87uhgjfg