The layers supporting the continental drift hypothesis in Africa, South America, India, and Australia include geological formations such as matching rock types, fossil records, and coal deposits. For instance, the presence of similar sedimentary rock layers and fossils of ancient plants and animals, like the Glossopteris fern, across these continents suggests they were once connected. Additionally, paleomagnetic evidence shows that these continents have moved over geological time. This alignment of geological features across separated continents provides compelling evidence for the theory of continental drift.
Which type of evidence was NOT used by Alfred Wegener to support his continental drift hypothesis human remains
composition of meteorites
G
I don't know. :p
human remains
Because of sea floor spreading
They are lined up if you put them together.
They are lined up if you put them together.
Fossils found on separate continents that are now far apart provide evidence for continental drift. Similar fossil species found on continents that were once connected suggest that these landmasses were once united. Additionally, matching rock formations and paleoclimate evidence from fossils support the hypothesis of continental drift.
Similar rock formations, fossils of the same species, and ancient climate patterns found in these continents are evidence of their past connection through the supercontinent Pangaea. These layers offer critical support for the theory of continental drift, which suggests that the continents were once joined and have since moved apart over millions of years.
Because of sea floor spreading
Scientist rejected Wegners hypothesis of continental drift at first because he did not have enogh evidence to support his theory. He failed to provide a suitable mechanism that could cause the continents to move.