The foremost difference is that the 1905 failed while the 1917 succeeded. The 1905 seems to have been unplanned, beginning with a mutiny aboard a Black Sea Fleet battleship, and the 1917 was both planned and well coordinated according to Marxist doctrine. Both revolutions happened in proximity with Russian wars, but the war with Germany was likely more devastating for the Russian people than the war with Japan.Alternate Answer/Opinion:The differences between the 1905 revolution and the "1917 revolution" must be looked at keeping in mind that there were two separate revolutions in 1917.As to the 1905 revolution was not a true revolution in the sense that the people of Russia were looking to overthrow the Tsarist government.Nevertheless, there was some planning to it in the sense that Father Georgy Gapon organized a march of over a hundred thousand people to bring petitions of grievances to the Tsar at the Winter Palace. They were marching peacefully even chanting patriotic songs; but the Tsar ordered a Cossack cavalry unit to ride through the crowd killing people. Then he ordered his palace guard to fire their rifles into the crowd. This disregard for human life then spurred the crowd into a spontaneous demonstration and strike which spread to workers, soldiers and peasants elsewhere. It became a full scale riot but not truly a revolution. The Tsar was forced to concede to create a democratically elected legislature and promise many new civil liberties. That satisfied the people and they stopped rioting. It wasn't successful in in getting rid of the government, but it was never intended to do that.In 1917 there was the February Revolution and the October Revolution. The February Revolution was totally unplanned. It began in Petrograd (St. Petersburg) with a demonstration by several women complaining about food shortages. It quickly spread to other areas of the city and to workers, soldiers and peasants and then to other cities as well. Then it got out of hand and the Tsar was forced to abdicate. It was all very surprising, in fact Lenin was in Switzerland at the time and didn't even know about it until it was all over.The October Revolution was planned very carefully by the Bolsheviks. They seized key rail and telegraph stations in all the large cities simultaneously and paralyzed the Provisional Government. It was more like a military coup than a popular rebellion.
Hopefully they will, constitutional Monarchy is the best form of government, without a legitimate Monarch standing on the side lines keeping an eye on things governments tend to become horrifically corrupt, example the United States, Rev. France and current Russian Government.
Well, if I could bring you something this week, and you could bring me something next week, maybe after that we could just meet in the middle and...trade stuff.
World War I exacerbated existing political and social tensions in Russia, leading to widespread discontent among soldiers and civilians alike. The war resulted in significant military defeats, economic hardship, and food shortages, which fueled anger towards the Tsarist regime. As public support for the government waned, revolutionary ideas gained traction, culminating in the February Revolution of 1917, which ultimately led to the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II and the rise of the Bolsheviks. The chaos of the war provided both the opportunity and the impetus for revolutionary change in Russia.
there was no really date for the start of cold war. =The soviet union and the united state hated each other but they helped each other during WW2. After they won they wanted half of what Germany conquered. When they had these lands they made them communist and U.S didn't want the spread of Communism so they argued and supplied democratic country to fight of communism which was like a starting point for the war.=
The October and February Revolutions brought the end of the tzarist regime and brought the Bolsheviks into power. The civil war ended all communist opposition in Russia, leading to communist takeover.
Russia is one of the countries which embraced the communist movement. Communism is supposed to bring equality and safety into society.
Germany helped Lenin (a communist) get to Russia hoping that he would help to overthrow the Russian monarchy, and start a communist revolution. A revolution would mean Russia would be involved in a internal Russian war/Civil War instead of fighting with Germany
They bring change, sometimes with unintended consequences.
In Soviet Russia, service dog needs to bring you.
The American colonists subsequently, coming after or later, founded a republican control might bring about a revolution that would destroy their own power.
Revolutions are important because they can lead to significant social, political, and economic changes that may not be possible through peaceful means. Revolutions have the potential to bring about greater equality, justice, and freedom for marginalized groups, and they can challenge oppressive systems and institutions. Additionally, revolutions often serve as a catalyst for progress and can spark widespread movements for transformative change.
Revolutions bring change. It may not always bring the desired change and there are often unintended consequences as a result.
Communist
I'm not sure what you mean by "they." "They" could be anyone.
have meat
the Sans-culottes