It is often said that two of the main reasons that Britain avoided revolution at the time were growing democracy, though it was still far from perfect, combined with a certain willingness on the part of the old elites to accept change. I'd add a third reason which may strike many as odd: by comparison with most of Continental Europe, most of mainland Britain was prosperous.
I like the answer above, also a revolution is defined as a fundamental or complete change in the mode of production in the political and social system, or in some aspects of social cultural or intellectual like. This is not a general change such as a change in rulers politically, it is a revolution. Britain managed to avoid this by, instead of trying to constantly Dodge the issues raised and complaints made, introducing reforms. A litehearted example is a kettle boiling uncontrollably, if the lid is held down then the whole room will eventually get splattered and the person will need a complete face transplant, all he is doing is slowing the inevitability, whereas if the steam is let out slowly in small bursts then the boiling may slow and eventually stop, the reforms were the government letting out the steam
It's fertility rate! (D)
in Great Britain in the 1700s
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain heavily taxed the fur trade in Oregon in the 1840s
It's fertility rate! (D)
in Great Britain in the 1700s
Glorious Revolution 1688
Great Britain
Great Britain
there was no King - the monarch was Queen Victoria, and her husband was Prince Albert
Great Britain
Great Britain
Itβs mortality rate
In Great Britain
They opposed it.