south relied upon agriculture, bringing its downfall due to lack of power since they relied mostly on Britain to supply them. (which was very dumb)(thats basically saying fight the war for us)
The colonies began that way. The southern colonies had vast flat land with plenty of water and it was a natural progression to plant crops. While the north had some cash crops but in other areas the land was not good for crops so they had to develop industry, shipping, and other means to earn a living.
Before, during and after the US Civil War, the Southern economy was based on agriculture. This was not a problem when the USA was united. During the US Civil War, the lack of an industrial base was a handicap for the South.
Before, during and after the US Civil War, the North's strong industrial base had its roots in the Industrial Revolution. The more densely populated North had textile mills, for example that were powered by the waterfalls in New England. The British had introduced factories that were well suited to the ports and workmen that were a large supply of labor. The South, on the other hand had soil and a climate well suited to growing cotton, rice and tobacco. As one nation, the USA was perfectly balanced. Southern agriculture helped to fuel the industrial North. For example, the Northern textile mills required the cotton grown by slave labor in the South. This gave the North a price edge in textile production. The USA was quite content in the cash products, like cotton, that were sold overseas to Europe.
because people just started using machines so their were only a few industries
Because the north had more natural and urban resources that were plentiful and because the south was still recovering from civil war.
I'm trying to find that out myself! Try Yahoo answers, if it's not there your out of luck cause ask.com doesn't have it.
Slavery was less successful in the north due to the fact that the north was more of a merchant society than the south was. Slavery was more "necessary" in the south because of the vast amount of farmland that was present in the south. The north however, relied more on trading/
The third statement is untrue. The Northern advantage in manufacturing industry was most significant, especially in the increasingly mechanised farming techniques.
The North had less use for slaves than the South did, and many Northern people helped slaves gain freedom.
At the time of the Civil War there were significantly fewer slaves in the North than in the South. Many African Americans enjoyed full freedom in the north.
The South had fewer large cities than the north.
The North was more industrialized while the South was agrarian.
The North was more industrialized than the South.
The North (Union) had more weapons as it was more highly industrialized than the South
The North is less industrailized than South Korea .
False; the North had far more soldiers than the South.
The North had less farm machinery than the South.
The south was not as powerful as the north. The north had more advantages than the south. The south had less transportation and not as many weapons.
no
There was some slavery, for a time, in the North, but there were more crops in the South than in the North, e.g. less need in the north.
The North was much more advanced and industrialized than the South. Whilst the South was more agricultural. The North produced more weapons. Plus, the North had much more people, while in the South, most people were spread out, living two or three miles away from each other.
Much less inbreeding....
Yes, North Korea is larger than South Korea by 7,918.43 sq miles of land.