If you read the Old Testament, Genius to Deuteronomy, you will see many passages where God condones slavery and even rewards slave holders.
Genesis 9:25-27: "Cursed be Canaan! The Lowest of slaves will he be to his brothers. He (Noah) also said, 'Blessed be the lord, the God of Shem! May Canaan be the slave of Shem. May God extend the territory of Japheth; may Jadpheth live in the tents of Shem and May Canaan be his Slave.'"
Basically what happened (based on the biblical passage; Gen 9:20-27) was that Noah got drunk one day and fell asleep in his tent, naked. His son Ham woke him up, so Noah cursed the son of Ham, Canaan, to be a slave, and for all of Canaan's ancestors to be slaves to the ancestors of Ham's brothers, for eternity.
This passage laid the base for the argument of the Christian approval in slavery. It was widely accepted that the ancestors of Canaan settled in Africa, and therefore it was religiously justifiable to force them into slavery. Fortunately this viewpoint is no longer accepted
White southerners used religion to justify slavery by selectively interpreting biblical passages that seemed to support the idea of slavery as a natural and accepted practice. They often cited passages from The Bible that appeared to endorse slavery, such as those that prescribed obedience to masters. This interpretation was used to reinforce the belief that slavery was sanctioned by God and therefore beyond reproach.
Sojourner Truth claimed that slavery was sanctioned by the religion of America because slave owners used religion to justify their actions, quoting Bible verses to support slavery. She argued that this practice distorted the true teachings of faith and made a moral wrong seem acceptable by conflating it with religious beliefs. Truth believed that this false justification perpetuated the institution of slavery.
Religion played a significant role in shaping views on slavery throughout history. Some religious beliefs were used to justify slavery, while others provided moral arguments against it. For example, in the United States, some slave owners used the Bible to justify the practice of slavery as being sanctioned by God, while many abolitionists cited religious principles to advocate for the abolition of slavery.
Some people justified slavery by using religious arguments, such as citing passages from the Bible that appeared to condone enslavement. They interpreted these passages to suggest that slavery was a natural, God-ordained institution and that slaves should obey their masters. This religious justification helped perpetuate the institution of slavery by giving it a moral veneer to those who subscribed to such beliefs.
Abolitionists used religion to justify their cause by emphasizing Christian values such as compassion, equality, and dignity for all individuals, regardless of race. They argued that slavery was incompatible with these beliefs and that it went against the teachings of love and justice in the Bible. Many abolitionists were motivated by their faith to fight against slavery and believed it was their moral duty to work towards its abolition.
The argument used to justify slavery based on religious beliefs often cited passages from the Bible that appeared to support the idea of slavery, such as verses that discussed servitude or owning slaves. Slave owners would often interpret these passages as approval from God to own slaves and use them for labor. This interpretation was used to maintain control over enslaved individuals and justify the cruelty of slavery.
by arguing that some people were created to rule others.
Declaration of Independence
Sorry I do not know honestly .... Hehehe
it was critical for the south's agricultural economy.
Pro-slavery means that you favor slavery, & want it to stay.
People in the South justified the continuation of slavery by arguing that it was essential for their economy and way of life, that slaves were racially inferior and needed guidance, and that slavery was sanctioned in the Bible. This belief in the superiority of white people and the economic benefits of slavery led many in the South to defend its continuation.
The plantation needed a source of inexpensive labor.
It was critical for Southampton agriculture economy
One argument used by southern slave holders to justify slavery was the belief that African Americans were inferior and needed to be controlled and guided by whites for their own good. They also argued that slavery was essential for the economic prosperity of the southern states, as it provided a cheap source of labor for plantations.
Richard Furman, a Baptist pastor, argued in his exposition on slavery that slavery was morally justified because it was practiced in the Bible. He believed that it was a natural social order where slaves were well-treated and slavery was a means of civilizing and Christianizing Africans. Furman's views reflected the pro-slavery arguments prevalent in the American South during the 19th century.
The plantation system of the south had been built on slavery, in many Southerners feared that their economy couldn't survive without it.
It was used to justify the existence of slavery