The question is way too complicated for a simple answer to do it justice. Basically, it comes down to a matter of how it's presented and who's doing it.
First, let me make clear that this only applies to public schools. Private schools can paint them on every wall of the building and hold thrice-daily assemblies where the students chant them in unison if they want to and nobody can say boo, since they're, well, private, and any parent who is paying to send their kid to such a school is presumably okay with it.
If they're displayed officially (by a teacher or school official), the trend is for courts to interpret this as a violation of the "establishment" clause of the First Amendment, since teachers and school officials of public schools are government employees. There have been exceptions, particularly when they're presented in context (for example, in a comparative religion section of a social studies class as an example of what a particular religious group believes, rather than in, say, math class as absolute rules that apply to everyone).
If they're displayed personally (for example, a student wears a shirt with them on it or has them written on the cover of his or her notebook), that's frequently been interpreted as an exercise of the right to free speech, also guaranteed by the First Amendment. Sometimes display by teachers has been interpreted this way as well, though that's less common. However, codes that serve to prohibit this kind of display have been held constitutional, provided that they don't specifically single out a particular viewpoint or religion (that is, if it's just as prohibited to display the File Pillars of Islam or the Noble Eightfold Path or Go Local Sports Team, then the rule is probably constitutional).
It's a little difficult to imagine a US public school objecting to the practice of the Ten Commandments ("I was just following Thou Shalt Not Kill." "No! I demand you murder that kid! And you'd better start coveting your neighbor's ass while you're at it!"), though less difficult than it would have been thirty years ago.
I'm pretty sure no because of separation of church and state. (you mean public schools right?)
let me think.... hmpp! no!
The ten commandments differ in treatment of individuals by making sure everybody understands what should be obeyed and what should not.
Well they should because the Ten Commandments are located in Exodus, which is part of the Bible.
A:What difference would it make to the Newtown massacre? The Ten Commandments are not a talisman that can ward off evil. Nor do they attract Satan's attention and bring evil upon those who display them. Adam Lanza may or may not have been a Christian, even a pious one, but it is unlikely that religion was at the heart of what he did.
absolutely
The display of the Ten Commandments in a county courthouse can raise concerns about the separation of church and state. To avoid potential conflicts, it may be best to keep religious displays out of government buildings to ensure inclusivity and respect for all beliefs.
ten commandments totally
Peter O'Toole was not in "The Ten Commandments".
ten commandments of tour guide
The Ten Commandments in Filipino is translated as "Sampung Utos."
613 commandments.
Ten Commandments for Drivers was created in 2007.
The Ten Commandments was released on 10/05/1956.