There were many similarities among Europeans, Africans, and Native Americans first and foremost were the role gender played in their societies. Both Europeans and Native Americans assigned work based upon gender. In the new world men were the hunters, and women were the gatherers. In European society men were usually the breadwinners and working outside the home, women either worked in their own home, or was hired to work in someone else's home. Likewise in Africa, men did the heavy lifting duties, and women performed the domestic duties. They also shared a similar family structure.
None really, the Native Americans had a deep connection with nature and built mounds that looked like pyramids and built small villages.
The Australian Aborigines would burn the forests down to catch their food and were entirely nomadic, meaning they built nothing.
The above indicates an absolute lack of understandiing of Australian Aborigines. The Aborigines had a very close link to their land. It was the very centre of their being and existence. To be separated from their land was like death. As for the claim that they burnt forests - the Aborigines conducted carefully controlled burnoffs to limit bushfires (one of the reasons Australia suffers such severe bushfires in modern times is because the Aborigines no longer practise their controlled burns) and to flush out game for hunting.
The Aborigines ere not entirely nomadic: they were semi-nomadic. They built humpies (basic shelters) out of bark, twigs and branches, and followed the seasons for their food.
Other than farming and hunting as sources of food, I can't think of any.
African Americans and Native Americans are quite related because they both
My quiz said it was NOT cotton. I think it oil. Ya my homeschooling quiz says it oil. IM homeschooled btw
well i dont know
Both birds are carnivores and both are native Africans
148 years passed between Europeans first reaching the Americans and sugarcane being introduced in the West Indies. Christopher Columbus came to the Bahamas in 1492. English planted introduces sugarcane in 1640.
what are the similarities between basketball and ring-ball
His did the economy of the southern colonies depend on enslaved africans
Africans sold their slaves Europeans purchased the slaves the Africans were selling. Unlike Africans, Europeans wanted the adult males for hard labor
Africans sold their slaves Europeans purchased the slaves the Africans were selling. Unlike Africans, Europeans wanted the adult males for hard labor
No! The only difference between skin colors is Africans have more melanin (the pigment in your skin) than Europeans.
Areas of cooperation between the Europeans and native Americans
"Africans" refer to people who are native to the continent of Africa. "African-Americans" are descendants of Africans who were captured and brought to America as slaves. "European Africans" could refer to white people who were born or live in Africa, but are of European descent.
Crusades
the dividing between the lands of africans and europeans
Sociology
Neither. Puerto Ricans are as varied in origins as any American. There are white europeans, black africans, native americans, and many from the orient and every shade in between.
Americans inherited their views of Africans from the Europeans that preceded them. To the Europeans, Africans looked much more like animals (specifically monkeys) than they did to their own eyes. They also saw Africans as being less intelligent than they were since they did not have countries that could rival European countries in prestige and power. Of course, we know today that the difference between European and African societies has nothing to do with the color of skin. While it is debatable whether or not it was cultural or geographic superiority, it is clear that the racism is unwarranted.
Do you mean black Americans, Africans who became Americans, or Americans who became African?