no they enslaved them and beat the to do the work. :(
gunpowder
Because no one wants to be colonized (aka have their ancestral homelands stolen) by European imperialists.
imperialist were usually the northerns (The people killing them black haters) while anti-imperialists were the southerns (The people doing the right thing enslaving those black monstrosity's because they are not good for anything else but doing a white mans job)
Romanians want to free the Romanian territories invaded by the Austro-Hungarians imperialists.
European imperialists sought to establish spheres of influence and outright annexation of under developed nations and peoples. They saw the opportunity to enrich themselves at the expense of peoples that they dominated.
Land
no they enslaved them and beat the to do the work. :(
gunpowder
copper
The "white man's burden"The white man's burden
In many cases the European Powers built up the infrastructure of their colonies, mainly so European colonists could live and work there. Their presence also stopped many potential tribal conflicts from occurring, as long as the imperialists occupied the country. However, the European powers usually practiced a system of segregation, which excluded the native people from engaging in or benefiting from the occupation of the imperialists. The bulk of the country's natural resources were extracted for the sole purpose of enriching the coffers of European nations, while the people in the countries often languished in poverty.
Because no one wants to be colonized (aka have their ancestral homelands stolen) by European imperialists.
imperialist were usually the northerns (The people killing them black haters) while anti-imperialists were the southerns (The people doing the right thing enslaving those black monstrosity's because they are not good for anything else but doing a white mans job)
to gain influence in Africa without fighting each other
There are zero similarities between the two.
There are zero similarities between the two.