0
What is the common factor among the Ottoman Mughal Ghana Mali and Songhai empires?
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
There really are no commonalities with the one caveat that they were all "Islamic States". (Even this is not entirely true, since Ghana existed for 400 years before Islam arrived in its territory.) However, saying that all of these empires are "Islamic States" really says nothing about their overriding cultures, legal systems, internal organizations, foreign policies, etc.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did the ottoman safavid and mughal empires have in common?
They all possessed great military power and that's why known as the Gunpowder Empires. All three were great Islamic Empires. They all were Turkic nomadic conquerors. The government structure of all three was absolute monarchy.
What Mali and Songhai have in common?
Both Empires Werre Both Organizeed
Love of country and pride in a common cultural heritage regardless of political?
Historians have called some of the empires of the nineteenthcentury "prisons of nationalities." They were probably referring to theAustrian, Russian and Ottoman Empires. All of these containeddifferent national and cultural groups that wanted independence.
What do the classical empires have in common?
They're all Empires.
What did Songhai and Ghana have in common?
gold,great kindoms
Why do Ghana mali songhai all have in common?
gold,great kindoms
What do all answers have in common?
What brought wealth to these empires?
How might west Africa's history have been different if the invaders who conquered songhai had not firearms?
Firearms were the one main advantage that the Europeans had in subduing Africa. Without them, the pestilence common in Central Africa would have destroyed them along with a skilled Songhai defense. The Songhai would likely have survived.
How might west Africa history have been different if the invaders who conquered songhai had not had firearms?
Firearms were the one main advantage that the Europeans had in subduing Africa. Without them, the pestilence common in Central Africa would have destroyed them along with a skilled Songhai defense. The Songhai would likely have survived.
How might West Africa's history have been different if the invaders who conquered Songhai had not had firearms?
Firearms were the one main advantage that the Europeans had in subduing Africa. Without them, the pestilence common in Central Africa would have destroyed them along with a skilled Songhai defense. The Songhai would likely have survived.
How did Ottoman sultans justify their rule and maintain large diverse empires?
There are two distinct questions here.How did Ottoman sultans justify their rule?The Ottomans justified their power by their maintenance of power along a Divine Right analysis. This was relatively common at that time period.How did Ottoman sultans maintain large diverse empires?The Ottoman Empire grew and maintained itself through strategic alliances, modern military tactics, and novel inventions. They also pacified areas they controlled since they were relatively tolerant of different religions, ethnicities, and cultures. The Ottomans were intelligent and strategic in the disposition of the armies and were very capable of defeating their enemies and expanding their power. Secondly, the Ottomans were quick to establish a large bureaucracy and regional autonomy which made management of a physically expansive empire much easier.
How might west Africa's history have been different if the invaders who conquered songhai had not been firearms?
Firearms were the one main advantage that the Europeans had in subduing Africa. Without them, the pestilence common in Central Africa would have destroyed them along with a skilled Songhai defense. The Songhai would likely have survived.
