Add your opinion:
Britain and France joined Militarys last year so if it happened now France would be fighting alongside the British. The Queen of England is still Queen of 17 countries,Canada,Australia,New Zealand to name a few, their Militarys are "Royal" Militarys and swear their allgeiance to the Queen of England,so they couldn't sit back and see people attack their Queen as their Militarys have sworn their allgeinace to her for centuries. Both could also just nuke each other off the map easily. People can ignorantly say " USA has bigger military and funding so USA would win" is EXTREMELY IGNORANT as History has proven many times bigger does not equal better. Take England and look how tiny they are but still took over and ruled most of the world. Or Iraq and Afghanistan the Taliban don't even have 1% of the USA's Military funding or equipment but the Taliban are still taking on half the world.
UK.
The UK is part of the EU and is part of the european defense initiative which means if the UK is attacked the EU mobilizes all troops to assisted the UK.
So the US would be fighting to EU not only Britain.
So the EU: It has the largest army combined. and has the European defence initiative to defend against outside threats. It is also a stronger economy. it is also home to 3 of the 10 united nations security council members.
In terms of technology, EU. Germany in an industrial powerhouse so can produce on a scale much larger than the US. The US would not be able to compete in terms of new technology, a UK company is already started work on power Armour. whereas the US would not be able to have technological advancements because Americans can't think outside the box. Americans lack imagination there innovators not inventors. British people can adapt unlike any other race, for example Barnes wallace and RJ Mitchell.
also the EU is home to 2 of the best MBTs the challenger 2 and leopard 2.
also EU has good fighters that can simply outrun and outmaneuver the f22.
its all very well and good having a stealth fighter. but it has to spend 24 hours in the hanger after flying it and 30 mins on the runway before takeoff doing checks. the EF 2000 spends 5 mins in the hanger per hour of flying and takes 1 min to rearm and refuel and 2 mins from hanger to 60,000 feet.
Also 82% of the US munitions are made by British company BAE systems so the US would run out in an all out war.
the US armed forces are not the best trained army either and on fighting terms a British soldier could possibly kill them on a 5:1 kill ratio (based on NATO exercises averages) a British Para/ commando could possibly kill them on a 8:1 ratio, a Gurkha on a 21/1 kill ratio, a German soldier is on a 3:1 ratio a french soldier on a 4/1 average and a french foreign legionary on a 9:1 ratio.
british special forces are the best in the world and train US forces so would possibly go on a barracks killing spree.
So to sum up the US would loose because:
lack of imagination
interventions of the EU
better training
Canada, America has a lot of weapons and technological advancement of war but the war wouldn't just be Canada vs US. Canada a Commonwealth Realm so The United Kingdom would enter the war Australia and New-Zealand might enter the war other Realms might be asked to participate but would only do so in a symbolic way so the war would actually be :
United States of America vs Canada, UK (maybe Australia and New-Zealand)
For previous war between Canada and the US (The Revolutionary War - American invasion, 1775-1783, The War of 1812, 1812-1815) Canada won the war with the help the British Empire.
But it would be much more complicated today regarding the current relation between US and other countries and Canada and other countries.
Correction: canada did not win the war of 1812 because nobody actually won that war
I should front this by stating that such a war is extremely unlikely to occur. Britain and the USA have one of the friendliest inter-state relationships on the planet.
However as the US spends roughly 10 times on defence as the UK, it seems inevitable that the US would prevail. If nuclear weapons were engaged then both countries would not come out well (to say the least!), but the UK would in all likelihood be utterly annihilated.
well if it was just Britain v Canada and no interference then i would have to say that whoever invades first will lose. this is because the canadians have a population of 30 million and they are very widespread in some areas meaning that the occupation would probably cost more than the invasion. getting to Canada would take a while to and when the british get there they would have to expierence a tough time trying to take the 2nd largest nation in the world because of nature.
on the other hand if the canadians attcked Britain first they would have less troops on the ground for starters and since the UK is small then airbases and military bases are closer together not to mention the UK concentrates largely on fighters and the Canadian task force ships would probabaly all sink or surrender meaning that the canadians would have to surrender as supplies wouldn't be able to get through.
in event of war the canadians could last longer as they sit on more Natural Resources and could sink much shipping too.
in this scenario then i think that canda would have the upper hand in a war where no one really attacks the other. and the invader would lose in the event of a large scale invasion.
if allies were involved then the nation which starts the war will lose. i shudnt need to explain this one because it is obvious that allies will stick up for the defendant
also if ur wondering im british and also this would never happen as Canada is still British through crown and some of the population no matter what the government sustem in Canada is
UK will win because they have better weapon's then Germany they like war but we like winning
the US.
Canada because they have allies and green land don't
ukraine.
Burma will win. Most of the thailander are gays.
Vietnam
Myanmar
america will have vectory
Chuck Norris.
Canada because they have allies and green land don't
The Americans planned to win the war by conquering Canada and needed control of the lakes to do so.
The Americans planned to win the war by conquering Canada and needed control of the lakes to do so.
The Americans planned to win the war by conquering Canada and needed control of the lakes to do so.
Britain.
Neither.
america
vietnam
depends
ukraine.