No they simply had no military force or will available to them at the time.
The "Big Three" were, The United States (Franklin Roosevelt), England (Winston Churchill) and the Soviet Union (Joseph Stalin).
A very good question- but with no certain answer. The actions by Britain's government may have encouraged continued aggressive actions by Adolph Hitler, rather than discouraging it. When Britain attempted to aid the French, they were pushed out of France, and came close to losing the military forces in France. After that the British were busy trying to keep Germany from invading Britain. It is possible that are more direct early opposition to Germany might have at least delayed fighting, but in my opinion, it would not have indefinitely prevented the war.
Aggressive usually means characterized by force, invasion, or hostility.(aggressive actions)It can also be used for actions that are assertive or vigorous.(aggressive campaign, aggressive treatment)Anything that has a characteristic of aggression. It is an inclination to act toward something or someone with an actively hostile or vigorous mannerism.
France
The Axis Aggression in WWII is just what you have already stated. It is the aggressive actions of Germany, Italy, Spain, and Japan during WWII. Remember that when the Axis Aggression was created the U.S. was not yet involved in the war.
It allowed the leadership of affected countries to take aggressive actions against other countries without the input from the people of those affected countries. And because the countries with totalitarian regimes were run from the top down, the people in those countries could not object to the leadership's actions.
The Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931The invasion of Abbysinia by Italy in 1935The re-militarisation of the Rhineland by Germany in 1936All these were aggressive actions, but whether they threatened world peace is debatable.
concentration camps, and death camps
His actions involved growing Germany's military, creating air forces, and expanding land that was taken away from them.
2
Grmany, (Hitler) Italy, (Mussolini)and Japan. (military/government officials)
The weakness and un willingness of the european powers and others to react and commit to military actions as a result of the first world war
A very good question- but with no certain answer. The actions by Britain's government may have encouraged continued aggressive actions by Adolph Hitler, rather than discouraging it. When Britain attempted to aid the French, they were pushed out of France, and came close to losing the military forces in France. After that the British were busy trying to keep Germany from invading Britain. It is possible that are more direct early opposition to Germany might have at least delayed fighting, but in my opinion, it would not have indefinitely prevented the war.
Aggressive usually means characterized by force, invasion, or hostility.(aggressive actions)It can also be used for actions that are assertive or vigorous.(aggressive campaign, aggressive treatment)Anything that has a characteristic of aggression. It is an inclination to act toward something or someone with an actively hostile or vigorous mannerism.
So strong that a mighty coalition nations was needed to destroy his growing empire
Aggressive usually means characterized by force, invasion, or hostility.(aggressive actions)It can also be used for actions that are assertive or vigorous.(aggressive campaign, aggressive treatment)Anything that has a characteristic of aggression. It is an inclination to act toward something or someone with an actively hostile or vigorous mannerism.
He fvcked people.
France