Europe didn't intervene in the American Civil War because of purely economic reasons and purely social reasons. Europe was home to some of the greatest US exports, and because of the US, they had created a very vibrant economy. But, European aristocrats saw slavery as the pin that held the US economy together; and in some regards, it was. Because of this, the European governments were economically bound not the help the North, because this would overturn slavery in US, and thus, US economy. But, Europeans had a strong distaste for using slaves, however hipocritical this may have been. And most European governments feared a rebellion if they were to fight for slavery in a foreign land. Thus, Europe was not permitted to help the South. Which only left the European governments with the option of sit and wait.
Because Lincoln headed them off by issuing the Emancipation Proclamation - turning the war into an official crusade against slavery, so that free nations abroad could not aid the Confederates without looking pro-slavery themselves.
The author that wrote the above probably believes that, but I don't.
Europeans did support the South! The Rothschilds wanted to be Americas banker. They knew that if the nation could be broken into two, the weaker nations would need them. The Rothschilds wanted and started the war!
On August 22, 1862 Lincoln said in a letter to Horace Greeley: I know with absolute certainty that the division of the United States into two parts was decided long before the Civil War by the financial powers of Europe. These bankers were afraid that if the United States remained as one nation, it would attain economic and financial independence, which would upset their financial domination over the world.
This question is quite subjective as it mentions "Europe". The fact is that in all types of international politics, reasons for acting or not acting can be numerous and complicated. The bottom line is that the main nations in question here are France and Great Britain. These nations did not believe it would be in their self interest to recognize the Confederate States of America. Should the Union prevail, then a modern, somewhat powerful United States, would now be their enemy in terms of trade and other things. What France and Britain did do was help supply the South ( unofficially ) with weapons and warships. With a Union victory, their excuse would be, this type of aid was made through private parties, not with the blessing of the governments of these two powerful powers. Should, however, the South succeed in becoming independent, trade and other factors would smooth over any bad feelings concerning the fact that the South was not formally recognized. What indeed happened was that Britain & France gained financially with their unofficial aid, and gained diplomatically with non recognition, with the US. Now, with that said, France's position in Mexico was hurt with the Union victory.
No he was the Commander in Chief of the Union.
There is no ruler of Europe. Europe is a continent made up of individual countries, each with their own system of choosing a leader.
The part of a government that holds power in a confederacy is the state government. The federal government has limited power in this government.
The top ten European countries by population are...Russia *GermanyTurkey *FranceUnited KingdomItalySpainUkrainePolandRomaniaThe top ten European countries by area are...Russia *Kazakhstan *Turkey *FranceUkraineSpainSwedenGermanyFinlandNorway* only partially in Europe
To assert the viabiliy of the Confederacy as a sovereign nation and gain official recognition by Congress and by foreign countries.
The French and the English did not support the Confederacy during the Civil War. Instead, the countries decided to support the Union.
Europe needed cotton .
Different countries in Europe have all sorts of extradition laws.
They supported the confederacy.
France and some countries in Europe
There is no such thing as the 'European confederacy'.
Jefferson Davis was the President of the Confederacy.
Scallywags
Before Oslo Agreement, every country supported one side, after this agreement: *countries that recognize Israel. *countries that agree with Israeli actions *countries that abstaining for both sides. *countries that support Palestine no matter what. *countries that support both most of the time. We can say that most of the Western countries support Israel, some no matter what and some agree on some things with the Palestinians. Over the years there have been more countries that recognize Israel and support her. In countries where most of the population are religious Muslims or Palestinians, there is problem with recognizing Israel. Many Jews in Europe are afraid that the immigration of Muslims to Europe will make these countries Anti-Israel.
The Confederacy hoped that the United Kingdom and the French Empire would support them, as these were arguably the two most powerful countries in the world at the time. Additionally, these two countries generally didn't like the idea of a powerful United States, so each had an interest in helping the Confederacy break away. However, Emancipation Proclamation in January 1863 largely ended those hopes. England and France had both banned slavery already, and now could not support the Confederacy, which sought to retain slavery. Later in the summer of 1863, devastating Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg made it clear that the Confederacy had little hope of ultimately winning the war.
Two different countries.
No he was the Commander in Chief of the Union.