Gettysburg ruined the South! Serves those Johnny Rebs right, they deserved it! because the north had better high ground and they had a lot more amount of people to fight for them. Grant's victory over Pemberton (a Pennsylvanian who chose to wear the uniform of a Confederate general) at Vicksburg is considered the most decisive battle by some historians because it split the South in two, completing one part of General Scott's three-part plan for strangling the South. [Efforts to capture Richmond were botched by General McClellan, and the US Navy blocade was only 2/3 successful.] Gettysburg was a three-day battle. Lee did well enough on the first two days, but he lost on the third day, more to Meade's subordinates than to Meade himself. Pemberton abandoned Vicksburg to Grant on the third day of Gettysburg, and Northern newspapers concentrated on Gettysburg instead. [In World War II, General Clark had his thunder stolen in a similar manner as he let a German army escape so he could capture Rome for its Propaganda value, but it was all for naught because it coincided with Eisenhower's invasion of Normandy. Like the Seige of Vicksburg, the Italian Campaign had dragged on slowly. Like Gettysburg, the Normandy Invasion was new and exciting in the public consciousness. Unlike Vicksburg, Rome had no strategic value.] Also, note that Pemberton was disliked and distrusted by other Confederate generals because he was born in the North, yet he held Vicksburg until it became indefensible before withdrawing his army. To answer the original question, the South actually won most of the large battles, but Vicksburg was decisive for its strategic value, and Gettysburg was a fantastic Northern propaganda victory. It dissolved any chance that a British army would attack the North from Canada, and a French army would arise from Mexico to reinforce the South.
The North won chiefly because it had a much bigger population from which to recruit armies (it ended up as a war of attrition), and also an industrial manufacturing base.
The South lost because the natural aggression of the Southerner often emerged in the form of violent feuds between Confederate Generals, who were not properly controlled by President Jefferson Davis. Also their ports were blockaded, preventing them from exchanging their cotton for war supplies.
They suffered from death and sickness.And lost family members
The impact that the Civil War had on the North and the South was: North: * North abolished slavery after the war because of the Emancipation Proclamation South * South grew poor * South experienced inflation
They were "the Civil War". The North and the South were going against each other. They were fighting against slavery (the North). And the South wanted slavery.
no
the north
Apparently the south lost the civil war which in turn means the north controlled the south.
In both the Vietnam & US Civil War the south was the loser & the north was the victor.
Most of the major battle in the Civil War were fought in the South (except for a few in Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Vermont). The South lost the war.
The south lost the U.S Civil War.
The south lost the civil war
The south lost the war b/c the north outmanned and outclassed the south at almost every point ,milatary
The north won the civil war.
The North won and the South lost in both undeclared wars; US Civil War & Vietnam.
South
Unless you are talking about Vietnam, the North Won! The Union, the north won, while the South confederacy lost
The north and the south fought against each other in the civil war.
we had the civil war because south America had slavery, the north did not. the south eventually lost the war, and they were so upset, they made their own country, which was called the confederacy. we just call it south America nowadays. hope you liked this answer.