0
The Roman Empire suffered a long, slow, but finally sure decline between the 3rd and 5th centuries C.E. for various reasons. The lack of consistently strong and wise leadership at the highest levels was one reason. The social disunity caused by religious dissension and conflict was another. Quite distinctly, the growing strength and confidence of Rome's aggressive neighbors to the north and east was perhaps the most significant, as these "barbarians" steadily encroached upon Roman territory and wealth with increasing success.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoI believe most falls are a domino effect. The first chip is almost always a fundamental collapse. The power makes its beliefs known and many of the people believe it or don't, cant comprehend or worse don't have the time or place to discredit or accept the norm. The power puts off what the people want because it can. It goes for century like most civilisation's do. That is until the foundations begin to crumble. You can recognize this from many places around our earth. We wonder what happens to these people? It is a classic example, look, and you can see, over and over again. Eventually people must leave for what they need to survive.
I believe if the people thought that the message of the center of their life was just, they would stay and make things work. The fact they collapsed suggest conflicts if their core beliefs as a society and loss of Natural Resources. IE The Bible is a children's book from 10,000 years ago and the loss of electricity.
Wiki User
∙ 14y agoDebasement of currency/coinage and it's resulting Hyperinflation - could no longer pay the troops / workers anything of value and the whole structure came apart
the Romans got lazy and payed missionaries to fight their battles.
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoa combination of attacks from outside, along with a rapid turnover of emperors and an increasingly poor economy (caused by invaders like the Vandals and goths - who manage to take the wealthiest land in the Western empire, and who ravaged Italy itself essentially ruining the economy). The final blow was the failed attempt to regain the resource rich north African provinces which provided the vast majority of the Wests income.
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoHere are key factors. This list does not cover all of them:
1)Infaltion caused by years of debasement of the coins. The gold and silver content of gold and silver coins was continually decreased to produce more coins to finance imperial expenses. This devalued the coins which at one point had virtually no value. This created runaway inflation.
2) Trade broke down as coins were useless.
3) The urban economy collapsed as cities produced goods for trade. The population of cities shrunk.
4) The large landed estates stopped producing crops for the cities and concentrated on production for local barter.
5) Impoverished tenant peasants and migrants who left the cites were turned into servile labour by the owners of the large estates.
6) The army found it difficult to deal with repeated attempted invasions across the vast frontiers of the empire, areas of which were devastated by the invaders. The empire became vulnerable.
7) Because of the threats to the empire the size of the army more than doubled. Wars and the size of the army became a financial burden.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoRoman empire's decline main reason was result of worsening internal problems, the separation of the Western Empire from the wealthier Eastern part, and outside invasions.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoTaxes, bad rulers and it would help if your people liked you.
Gracchi Bros
Marius
Sulla
First Triumvirate
Second Triumvirate
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was the ancient romans most significant contribution to europe?
I would say religion was the ancient Romans' most significant contribution to Europe. Christianity developed from a religion among a small group of Jews (who lived in Judea, which was part of the Roman Empire) into a mass religion in the Roman days. It spread around the Roman Empire. It became state religion. Catholic Christianity and Orthodox Christianity developed during the Later Roman Empire. They were originally called Latin or Western Christianity and Greek or Eastern Christianity respectively. The former was the main form of Christianity in the western part of the Roman Empire and the latter was the main form of Christianity in the eastern part of the Roman Empire.
What were the main ways of transportation in ancient Roman?
What types of transportation were used to travel between different regions of the Roman Empire?
What is a central room in wealthy Roman's homes?
The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".The main room of an ancient Roman house was the "atrium".
The roman republic was divided into which two main social classes?
In the 400s, Many countries, barbarians, tribes, & rebel armies attacked the roman empire,it enventualy caused half of it to be conquered. the area they conquered was called the western roman empire, & the otherp part that was left over was called the byzantine empire. the capital of the western roman empire was Rome & the capital of the Byzantine empire was Contantinople. both sides were eventualy conquered. the western was conquered by the barbarians in I mentioned at the beggining in 476 & the byzantine by the Ottomon empire in 1453 after a 40 day battle. but through all this carnage, Rome still stands to this day as one of the oldest cities on Earth.....but to a different Alliegance
What is the central feature of a Roman townhouse?
in the center of a roman toownhouse was the atrium (living room) witch connected all the other rooms (kitchen, bed rooms, ect.) though roman were very proud of there gardens.
What is the main reason for the decline and fall of the Roman empire and what might have been done to provent it?
There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.There is no main reason for the decline of the Roman empire. Rome's decline was a combination of several factors that had been building up over many years. Some of these factors were the devaluing of the currency, lack of strong leadership both in government and in the military, a weakened army and pressure on the borders from migrating peoples.
What were the main causes of the empire's decline Rome?
In thinking of the decline of the Roman Empire, it should be remembered that the decline of the empire was a cumulative thing. There were several factors that worked together to weaken the empire. Some of them were pressure on the borders, a weakened army, no effective military leadership, no new territories which could bring in new sources of revenue, lead poisoning, the sheer size of the empire and the lack of decent communications.
What factors lead to the decline and fall of the Rome empire?
Three? A recent German study has come up with 210 reasons for the decline and fall of the Roman empire. (Don't worry, I won't list them all) Three of the main reasons were a population shift which caused pressure on the borders. The population shift came about because Germanic tribes were being pushed into Roman territory by Asian tribes. The Roman army at the fall, was weak and apathetic as there was no incentive for a strong army, such as loot and Roman citizenship for the auxiliaries. There was, in addition, a monetary factor, as more money left the empire than was taken in, due to excessive consumerism.
What factors led to the rise odd the ancient roman empire?
the factors where separated into 3 categories: Economy, Political, and Social those are the main benefactors.
What is the thesis of the fall of rome?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. Historians have argue for a great number of reasons or factors which led to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire. Therefore, there are many theses. There are even historians who argue that this part of the Roman Empire did not fall. Instead, there was a transformation of this part of the empire into a new system of governance and culture. The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What is the main reason for the decline of the Umayyad dynasty?
it was due to the sepration of the western empire
Pleasure seeking was the most important reason for the decline of the mughal empire?
This is true that the Mughals were pleasure seeking but this was not the main reason for their decline. The weakening of the army plus the attacks from the Persians are the main reasons for their decline.
What was the main purpose for Roman numerals?
Numerical system of the Roman Empire
What happened on the fall on rome?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
Why was there a fall in ROme?
There was not a fall in Rome. The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What are two details about the fall of rome?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
What was the fall of Rome all about?
The term fall of Rome refers to the fall of the western part of the Roman Empire (the eastern part continued to exist for nearly 1,000 years). The fall of the western part of the Roman Empire was a process. Many factors contributed to this. The main one was the invasions by Germanic peoples (Vandals, Alans, Sueves and Burgundians). This part of the empire crumbled under the weight of these invasions. It lost political cohesion. There was a lot of infighting and a string of usurpations. The Romans were unable to respond to the invasions. Within some eighty years all the lands of this part of the empire were lost. Many historians think that prior to the fall of this part of the empire there was a decline of the Roman Empire as a whole.
