Hiring an employee based on their affiliation with their parents or siblings violates the prohibited personnel practice of nepotism. This practice undermines the merit-based system of employment by favoring relatives over more qualified candidates. Such actions can lead to a lack of diversity, diminished morale among employees, and potential conflicts of interest within the workplace. Ultimately, it compromises the integrity of the hiring process in public service.
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
An example of a prohibited personnel practice is discriminating against an employee based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, or genetic information. This includes actions such as hiring, firing, promoting, or compensating employees based on these factors.
yes
If the law calls for a Veteran's Preference to be given (as it is with most government positions) - OR - the employer voluntarily follows such a practice in their own business, this is NOT a prohibited practice.
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
Which of the following is NOT a prohibited personnel practice:1. Violating a Veterans hiring preference2. Considering employment recommendations based on personal knowledge in a hiring action3. Retaliating against and employer or applicant for reporting a possible violation of the law4. Deciding not to hire a qualified applicant because he or she has a mental disability
Prohibited Personnel Practice laws cover federal employees and applicants for federal employment. These laws protect individuals from unfair treatment in the hiring process or within their employment, specifically regarding discrimination, retaliation, and other unjust practices. They are designed to ensure that personnel actions are based on merit and not on prohibited factors like race, gender, or previous whistleblowing activities. Additionally, these protections extend to former employees who may face discrimination related to their prior federal service.
Supervisor stops an award after an employee reported discrepancies with TDY vouchers
The prohibited personnel practice that addresses improper hiring practices where agency officials give preference to one prospect over another is known as "favoritism" or "nepotism." Specifically, it falls under 5 U.S.C. § 2302(b)(6), which prohibits any action that discriminates against individuals in hiring or promotion based on personal relationships rather than merit. This practice undermines fairness and equal opportunity in the federal hiring process.